Abstract
Drawing from the field of management studies, we explore how a sample of voters in the United States, Canada, and the United Kingdom use a leader character framework to judge political leadership. We ask, how do voters actually assess the character of their current leaders? And, in light of the populist zeitgeist, do people who hold a populist attitude differ markedly in how they judge the character of political leaders? Our results show that voters generally consider character important. However, voters who lean toward populism believe character matters less in political leadership than individuals who scored low on the populism indicator. This durable difference merits more exploration in a political context marked by populism. Our findings about the factors that influence vote choice contribute to this conversation and to extant research that reports that some voters pay greater attention to leader characteristics than do others.
Subject
Public Administration,Sociology and Political Science
Reference43 articles.
1. Aarts, K., Blais, A., & Schmitt, H. (2011). Political leaders and democratic elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
2. Bakker, B., Rooduijn, M., & Schumacher, G. (2016). The psychological roots of populist voting: Evidence from the United States, the Netherlands, and Germany. European Journal of Political Research, 55(2), 302–320.
3. Ballard, E. J., & Suedfeld, P. (1988). Performance ratings of Canadian prime ministers: Individual and situational factors. Political Psychology, 9(2), 291–302.
4. Barber, J. D. (1972). The presidential character: Predicting performance in the White House. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
5. Bartle, J., & Crewe, I. (2002). The impact of party leaders in Britain. In A. King (Ed.), Leaders’ personalities and the outcomes of democratic elections (pp. 70–95). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献