Abstract
Resource consumption and related waste production are still rapidly increasing all over the world, leading to social and environmental challenges and to the production of the so-called ‘wastescapes’. Peri-urban areas—in-between urban and rural territories—are particularly vulnerable and prone to develop into wastescapes because they are generally characterised by mixed functions and/or monofunctional settlements, as well as by fragmentation in a low-density territory that is often crossed by large infrastructure networks. Moreover, peri-urban areas are generally the selected locations for the development of plants for waste management. In this way, they are crossed by waste flows of a different nature, in a landscape of operational infrastructures and wasted landscapes. Implementing Circular Economy (CE) principles, interpreting waste and wastescapes as resources, is a way to significantly reduce raw material and (soil) resource consumption, improving cities’ metabolism. A circular approach can positively affect the spatial, social and environmental performances of peri-urban areas. However, the transition towards a CE presents many challenges. This article outlines an approach to address these challenges, presenting a co-creation process among researchers, experts and stakeholders within Living Labs (LLs) processes. LLs are physical and virtual spaces, aiming at the co-creation of site-specific eco-innovative solutions (EIS) and strategies. In the LLs, public–private–people partnerships are developed by applying an iterative methodology consisting of five phases: Co-Exploring, Co-Design, Co-Production, Co-Decision, and Co-Governance. This article presents a case study approach, analysing the co-creation methodology applied in two peri-urban living labs, located in the Metropolitan Areas of Naples (Italy) and Amsterdam (The Netherlands), within REPAiR Horizon2020 research project.
Reference62 articles.
1. Amenta, L., & Attademo, A. (2016). Circular wastescapes. Waste as a resource for periurban landscapes planning. CRIOS, 12(12), 79-88. https://doi.org/10.3280/CRIOS2016-012008
2. Amenta, L., & Formato, E. (2016). Circular planning and adaptive design strategies to recycle wasted landscapes: The peri-urban territories of Campania Plain as a case-study. In C. Hein (Ed.), History Urbanism ResilienCE: Planning and Heritage. Proceedings of the 17th International Planning History Society Conference (pp. 437–448). Retrieved from https://journals.open.tudelft.nl/index.php/iphs/issue/view/456/IPHS1703
3. Amenta, L., & van Timmeren, A. (2018). Beyond wastescapes: Towards circular landscapes. Addressing the spatial dimension of circularity through the regeneration of wastescapes. Sustainability, 10(12). https://doi.org/10.3390/su10124740
4. Attademo, A. (2015). Being there: Living in the intercultural city. In
5. A. Falotico, N. Flora, F. D. Moccia, M. F. Palestino, S. Pone, F. Rispoli, M. Russo, S. Russo Ermolli, P. Scala (Eds.), Abitare insieme. DDimensione condivisa del progetto contemporaneo dello spazio condiviso di futuro [Living together: The contemporary design of collective spaces] (pp. 186–195). Naples: Clean Edizioni.
Cited by
45 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献