Post-Fordist Production and Urban Industrial Land Use Patterns

Author:

Roost Frank,Jeckel Elisabeth

Abstract

Economic restructuring of the 21st century is changing the production methods and location requirements of most industries. Mass production on the outskirts of cities, as was common in 20th century Fordism, is largely being replaced by an economic model characterised by a multitude of networked small and medium-sized production sites as well as logistics facilities. In this article, we want to examine if this also creates the opportunity to combine some of the smaller industrial areas with the city as a whole and to initiate a transformation of these areas in favour of redensification and mixed use. Examining the case of Kassel, Germany, we take a closer look at the transformation processes from Fordism to post-Fordism and the possibilities for a smarter land use. In this largely industrially shaped region, younger companies such as the solar panel producer SMA are using new approaches in terms of urban planning and land use by building their low emission-factories on greyfields in an urban environment rather than on suburban greenfields. In our article, we survey selected industrial areas in Kassel and discuss their recent change as part of a broader development from Fordism to post-Fordism. Firstly, the study contains a theoretical discussion of commercial and industrial land-use patterns in both socio-economic models. Subsequently, an on-site analysis is carried out to determine the extent to which both economic models have influenced the use and shape of industrial areas in Kassel. Based on this analysis, we finally show criteria for how urban planning can help to ensure that this change is combined with an improvement in the spatial and design quality of the industrial areas and is meaningfully integrated into the sustainable development of the city region.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Urban Studies

Reference25 articles.

1. Banik-Schweitzer, R., & Blau, E. (2003). Urban Form und die ‘postfordistische’ Stadt—Konzepte, Themen, Fragen [Urban form and the ‘post-Fordist’ city—Concepts, topics, questions]. In R. Banik-Schweitzer & E. Blau (Eds.), Städtebau in der postfordistischen Gesellschaft [Urban development in post-Fordist society] (pp. 7–22). Löcker.

2. Benke, C. (2021). Urbane Produktion und Handwerk 4.0—Perspektiven der Innenstädte als Zukunftsstandorte für das Handwerk [Urban production and craft 4.0—Perspectives of the inner cities as future locations for the craft]. In T. Krüger, M. Piegeler & G. Spars (Eds.), Urbane Produktion—Neue Perspektiven des produzierenden Gewerbes in der Stadt? [Urban production—New perspectives for the manufacturing industry in the city?] (pp. 113-128). Kohlhammer.

3. Bosch, G., & Wagner, A. (2002). Nachhaltige Dienstleistungspolitik [Sustainable service policy]. In G. Bosch, P. Hennicke, J. Hilbert, K. Kristof, & G. Scherhorn (Eds.), Die Zukunft von Dienstleistungen. Ihre Auswirkungen auf Arbeit, Umwelt und Lebensqualität [The future of services. Their effects on work, the environment and quality of life] (pp. 482–512). Campus Verlag.

4. Brandt, H., Hopmeier, I., & Holzapfel, H. (2004). EVALO—Eröffnung von Anpassungsfähigkeit für lebendige Orte. Verbundprojekt im Forschungsprogramm ‘Bauen und Wohnen im 21. Jahrhundert’ [EVALO—Opening of adaptability for lively places. Joint project in the research program ‘Building and living in the 21st Century’]. University of Kassel. http://www.uni-kassel.de/fb13/evalo/PDF_Down/EVALO_Endbericht.pdf

5. Bundesinstitut für Bau-, Stadt- und Raumforschung. (2016). Nachhaltige Weiterentwicklung von Gewerbegebieten: ExWoSt-Informationen 49/1 [Sustainable development of industrial areas: ExWoSt-Information 49/1]. https://www.bbsr.bund.de/BBSR/DE/veroeffentlichungen/exwost/49/exwost-49-1.pdf?__blob=publicationFile&v=1

Cited by 6 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3