Abstract
From smart devices to homes to cities, Internet of Things (IoT) technologies have become embedded within everyday objects on a global scale. We understand IoT technologies as a form of infrastructure that bridges the gaps between offline spaces and online networks as they track, transmit, and construct digital data from and of the physical world. We examine the social construction of IoT network technologies through their technological design and corporate discourses. In this article, we explore the methodological challenges and opportunities of studying IoT as an emerging network technology. We draw on a case study of a low-power wide-area network (LPWAN), a cost-effective radio frequency network that is designed to connect sensors across long distances. Reflecting on our semi-structured interviews with LPWAN users and advocates, participant observation at conferences about LPWAN, as well as a community-based LPWAN project, we examine the intersections of methods and practices as related to space, data, and infrastructures. We identify three key methodological obstacles involved in studying the social construction of networked technologies that straddle physical and digital environments. These include (a) transcending the invisibility and abstraction of network infrastructures, (b) managing practical and conceptual boundaries to sample key cases and participants, and (c) negotiating competing technospatial imaginaries between participants and researchers. Through our reflection, we demonstrate that these challenges also serve as generative methodological opportunities, extending existing tools to study the ways data connects online and offline spaces.
Reference53 articles.
1. Abildgaard, M. S. (2018). My whole life in telephones: Material artifacts as interview elicitation devices. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/1609406918797795
2. Ali, C. (2021). Farm fresh broadband: The politics of rural connectivity. The MIT Press.
3. Andrejevic, M., & Burdon, M. (2015). Defining the sensor society. Television & New Media, 16(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1527476414541552
4. Bar, F., & Galperin, H. (2004, October 8–9). Building the wireless infrastructure: Alternative models [Paper presentation]. International Workshop on Wireless Communication Policies and Prospects: A Global Perspective, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
5. Bijker, W. E., Hughes, T. P., & Pinch, T. J. (1987). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. The MIT Press.
Cited by
4 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献