Far-Right Digital Activism in Polarized Contexts: A Comparative Analysis of Engagement in Hashtag Wars

Author:

Chagas ViktorORCID,Carreiro Rodrigo,Santos Nina,Popolin Guilherme

Abstract

Literature on influence operations highlights the coordinated actions of digital activists aimed at persuading audiences. Scholars have discussed many angles of this behavior and emphasized repertoires based on specific contentious actions. However, little is discussed about how these disputes allow us to apprehend different models of political action in polarized contexts. On a whole, studies have not considered a broader understanding of digital activism performed by supporters of far-right governments. How does the far-right spread its agenda and support the government in “hashtag wars”? What kind of strategies are employed? This study seeks to compare patterns of coordinated behavior in hashtags created by supporters and detractors of the Bolsonaro government in Brazil that occupied the trending topics on Twitter. The statistical analysis is based on 6.1 million tweets taken from 20 political hashtags collected over a three-month period from May to July 2020. Data was scraped using Twitter’s Search API v3.0 for academic use. We analyzed the overall volume and peaks of tweets, the users they engaged with, and their network of influence, as well as the length of each hashtag. The results show an intense use of hashtag activism by Bolsonaro supporters, with users struggling for greater prominence in social media in the face of political events in Brazil. This article sheds light on how the far-right appropriates digital platforms to promote the government’s public image in times of political tension and how it promotes coordinated actions aimed at framing social media audiences.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Communication

Reference61 articles.

1. Arnaudo, D. (2017). Computational propaganda in Brazil: Social bots during elections (Working Paper No. 2017.8. Computational Propaganda Research Project. https://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:e88de32c-baaa-4835-bb76-e00473457f46

2. Ayoub, P., & Chetaille, A. (2017). Movement/countermovement interaction and instrumental framing in a multi-level world: Rooting Polish lesbian and gay activism. Social Movement Studies, 2017, 21–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1338941

3. Badouard, R. (2013). Les mobilisations de clavier [Networked mobilizations]. Reseaux, 181, 87–117. https://doi.org/10.3917/res.181.0087

4. Benford, R., & Hunt, S. (2003). Interactional dynamics in public problems marketplaces: Movements and counterframing and reframing public problems. In J. Holstein & G. Miller (Eds.), Challenges and choices: Constructivist perspectives on social problems (pp. 153–186). De Gruyter.

5. Benkler, Y., Faris, R., & Roberts, H. (2018). Network propaganda: Manipulation, disinformation, and radicalization in American politics. Oxford University Press.

Cited by 10 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3