Exploring Perceptions of Advantage and Attitudes Towards Redistribution in South Africa

Author:

Burns Justine,Leopold Lucas,Hartford Daniel,Njozela Lindokuhle,Langer Arnim

Abstract

Tackling inequalities and poverty in South Africa has proven extremely difficult and contentious. Indeed, redistribution policies are often widely criticized both by people who argue that these policies are not far‐reaching and comprehensive enough and by those who argue they are not justified, too large‐scale and/or ineffective, and should be scaled back. While public support amongst relatively advantaged South Africans is crucial for these redistribution policies to be enacted and maintained, interestingly, we know very little about how respective groups of “advantaged” South Africans from different ethnic groups view wealth transfers and other redistribution measures aimed at reducing the prevailing inequalities in South Africa. Drawing on a series of focus group discussions, we gain insights into perceptions of advantage and attitudes towards redistribution amongst groups of black and white “advantaged” South Africans respectively. We find that both black and white “advantaged” South Africans are reluctant to part with some of their wealth in the interests of greater economic equality, citing state corruption and extended network obligations as justification. In addition, there is a shared tendency to understate their economic advantage by identifying firmly as the middle class, thereby abrogating responsibility to the super‐wealthy whilst simultaneously expressing paternalistic views towards the poor.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Reference34 articles.

1. Aberson, C. (2003). Support for race-based affirmative action: Self-interest and procedural justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(6), 1212–1225.

2. Akerlof, G., & Kranton, R. (2000). Economics and identity. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 115(3), 715–753.

3. Becker, B. (2019). Mind the income gaps? Experimental evidence of information’s lasting effect on redistributive preferences. Social Justice Research, 33(2), 137–194.

4. Burger, R., & Jafta, R. (2010). Affirmative action in South Africa: An empirical assessment of the impact on labour market outcomes (Working Paper No. 76). CRISE. https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/57a08b2ced915d622c000b5d/workingpaper76.pdf

5. Chatterjee, A., Czajka, L., & Gethin, A. (2021). Wealth inequality in South Africa, 1993–2017 (Working Paper No. 2021/16). World Inequality Lab.

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3