Abstract
The debate on urban commons yields relevance for shared histories and heritage in divided and post-conflict societies. Albeit memory is always subjective, heritage management tends to engender a linear view of the past that suggests a preconceived future development. Where the past is denigrated to prove the impossibility of ethnoreligious communities’ coexistence even though they have lived together peacefully for centuries, it risks corroborating us-them divisions for posterity and undermines reconciliation and peacebuilding. In this historically informed article, we argue that urban change in Lahore since 1947 has gone hand in hand with the purposive destruction of the common heritage shared by India and Pakistan. This interpretation of the past for the future reflects different forms of violence that surface in heritage management. Based on empirical data collected on heritage practices in the Old City of Lahore, Pakistan, we analyse the approach of the Walled City of Lahore Authority towards heritage management. Our focus on ignored dimensions and objects of heritage sheds light on the systematic denial of a shared history with Hindus and Sikhs before and during the 1947 partition of British India. This partial ignorance and the intentional neglect, for instance, of housing premises inhabited once by Hindus and other non-Muslim minorities, prevent any constructive confrontation with the past. By scrutinising the relationship between urban change, nostalgia, memory and heritage, this article points out that heritage management needs to be subjected to a constructive confrontation with the past to pave the ground for future reconciliation.
Reference68 articles.
1. Aga Khan Trust For Culture, & Aga Khan Cultural Service Pakistan. (2011). Lahore Walled City Project: Quality of life, baseline socio-economic household survey, report 2008–2011.
2. Ahmed, I. (2012). The Punjab, blooded, partitioned, and cleansed: Unravelling the 1947 tragedy through secret British reports and first-person accounts. Oxford University Press.
3. Apaydin, V. (Ed.). (2020). Critical perspectives on cultural memory and heritage: Construction, transformation and destruction. UCL Press.
4. Ashworth, G. J. (2016). The memorialization of violence and tragedy: Human trauma as heritage. In B. Graham & P. Howard (Eds.), The Routledge research companion to heritage and identity (pp. 231–244). Routledge.
5. Avrami, E., Macdonald, S., Mason, R., & Myers, D. (Eds.). (2019). Values in heritage management: Emerging approaches and research directions. The Getty Conservation Institute.
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献