Author:
Haase Annegret,Schmidt Anika,Rink Dieter,Kabisch Sigrun
Abstract
The article analyses and discusses the development of Leipzig and especially its inner east as an ‘urban space of arrival’ since 1990. It represents a study about arrival in the post-socialist context that is fairly rare in the international debate so far, since most of the arrival debate builds on western European evidence. Leipzig’s inner east was characterised by shrinkage until the end of the 1990s and by new growth, especially after 2010, as the whole city grew. Since the second half of the 1990s the inner east has developed into a migrant area, referred to here as an ‘arrival space.’ Today, in 2020, it represents the most heterogeneous part of the city in terms of population structure and is one of the most dynamic areas in terms of in- and out-migration. At the same time, it represents an area where large amounts of the population face different types of disadvantage. Set against this context, the article embeds the story of Leipzig’s inner east into the arrival debate and investigates the area’s development according to the characteristics discussed by the debate. Our results reveal that Leipzig’s inner east represents a meaningful example of an arrival space in a specific (post-socialist, shrinkage followed by regrowth) context and that arrival and its spatial allocation strongly depend on factors like population, housing, and real estate market development, as well as policymaking and, significantly, recognition.
Reference56 articles.
1. Anthias, F. (2013). Moving beyond the Janus face of integration and diversity discourses: Towards an intersectional framing. The Sociological Review, 61(2), 323–343. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-954X.12001
2. Bannister, J., & Kearns, A. (2013). The function and foundations of urban tolerance: Encountering and engaging with difference in the city. Urban Studies, 50(13), 2700–2717. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013477705
3. Bernt, M. (2019). Migration and strategic urban planning: The case of Leipzig. disP: The Planning Review, 55(3), 56–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2019.1671002
4. Biehl, K. S. (2014). Exploring migration, diversification and urban transformation in contemporary Istanbul: The case of Kumkapı (MPI MMG Working Paper 14-11). Göttingen: MPI MMG.
5. Blokland, T. (2017). Community as urban practice. Oxford: Polity Press. Budnik, M., Grossmann, K., Haase, A., Haid, C., Hedke, C.,
Cited by
14 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献