Author:
Phan Selina,Cleave Evan,Arku Godwin
Abstract
Although innovation is a major theme in current local economic development and planning, there is a considerable uncertainty of what the concept specifically means, measured, and how outcomes are identified. To date, no study has investigated this glaring gap in scholarship. To address this gap, we interviewed economic development practitioners across cities in Ontario to identify and clarify how they define, apply, and measure innovation within their cities’ economic development strategies. Practitioners indicate that innovation plays a key role in their cities’ economic development strategy, demonstrating the importance of the concept within local governments. Additionally, it is clear that local governments are key facilitators of innovation. While many cities claim to have some form of innovation in their economic development strategies, a wide range of framings and approaches to innovation exist. Cities may not be taking the most efficient approach to fostering local innovation, which is critical with the rise of knowledge-based economic development.
Reference67 articles.
1. Amin, A. (2001). Moving on: Institutionalism in economic geography. Environment and Planning A, 33(7), 1237–1241.
2. Arku, G. (2015). Economic development practices of cities in Ontario, Canada. Community Development, 46(5), 604–615.
3. Asheim, B., & Gertler, M. (2006). The geography of innovation: Regional innovation systems. In J. Fagerberg (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of innovation (pp. 1–29). Oxford: Oxford Handbooks Online.
4. Asheim, B., Boschma, R., & Cooke, P. (2011). Constructing regional advantage. Platform policies based on related variety and differentiated knowledge bases. Regional Studies, 45(6), 1–12.
5. Aslesen, H., & Isaksen, A. (2007). New perspectives on knowledge‐intensive services and innovation. Geografiska Annaler: Series B, Human Geography, 89(1), 45–58.
Cited by
5 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献