Author:
Vecchio Marcello,Arku Godwin
Abstract
The exodus of manufacturing jobs from industrialized cities has increasingly altered the way municipalities plan and cope with buildings and areas that once served as industrial and economic centres. Now these often derelict and costly structures sit as an eyesore in many communities which experience symptoms of post-industrialism. The practice of adaptive reuse is a unique concept of city building, where demolition and traditional brownfield redevelopment have been common practice. Though an already established method, adaptive reuse is becoming increasingly popular due to a greater intensity to protect heritage, reuse materials and structures, and offer unique architectural spaces, there has been a demand to reuse former industrial buildings for other uses such as commercial and recreational spaces. To achieve this, there must be sufficient policy in place to incentivize and mitigate the increase cost and risk which are usually associated with this type of development. This article will focus specifically on Ontario, Canada, and the current Official Plans of all 51 of the province’s cities, and how they are addressing adaptive reuse in former industrial areas and unique ways in which they address this problem. A content analysis of the documents showed that there is a wide difference in reuse contextualization and suggested policy directives. However, Cities in Ontario have proposed that affordable housing, intensification, revitalization in the urban core, and creating spaces for creative and vibrant industries can be addressed by the promotion of reuse in the community. For those with strong industrial history, the applicability of reuse allows for communities to preserve their industrial heritage, while at the same time shift uses to the new economy.
Reference50 articles.
1. Arku, G. (2014). Competition and cooperation in economic development: Examining the perceptions of practitioners in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 99–118.
2. Baer, C., & Brown, T. (2006). Location quotients: A tool for comparing regional industry compositions. Incontext Indiana. Retrieved from http://www.incontext.indiana.edu/2006/march/1.asp
3. Blair, J. P., & Premus, R. (1987). Major factors in industrial location: A review. Economic Development Quarterly, 1, 72–85.
4. Bobrow, D., Eulau, H., Landau, M., Jones, C., & Axelrod, R. (1977). The place of policy analysis in political science: Five perspectives. American Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 415–433.
5. Bourne, L., Britton, J. N. H. N., & Leslie, D. (2011). The greater Toronto region: The challenges of economic restructuring, social diversity and globalization. In L. S. Bourne, T. Hutton, R. G. Shearmur, & J. Simmons (Eds.), Canadian urban regions: Trajectories of growth and change (pp. 236–268). Oxford: Oxford University Press
Cited by
11 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献