Promoting Adaptive Reuse in Ontario: A Planning Policy Tool for Making the Best of Manufacturing Decline

Author:

Vecchio Marcello,Arku Godwin

Abstract

The exodus of manufacturing jobs from industrialized cities has increasingly altered the way municipalities plan and cope with buildings and areas that once served as industrial and economic centres. Now these often derelict and costly structures sit as an eyesore in many communities which experience symptoms of post-industrialism. The practice of adaptive reuse is a unique concept of city building, where demolition and traditional brownfield redevelopment have been common practice. Though an already established method, adaptive reuse is becoming increasingly popular due to a greater intensity to protect heritage, reuse materials and structures, and offer unique architectural spaces, there has been a demand to reuse former industrial buildings for other uses such as commercial and recreational spaces. To achieve this, there must be sufficient policy in place to incentivize and mitigate the increase cost and risk which are usually associated with this type of development. This article will focus specifically on Ontario, Canada, and the current Official Plans of all 51 of the province’s cities, and how they are addressing adaptive reuse in former industrial areas and unique ways in which they address this problem. A content analysis of the documents showed that there is a wide difference in reuse contextualization and suggested policy directives. However, Cities in Ontario have proposed that affordable housing, intensification, revitalization in the urban core, and creating spaces for creative and vibrant industries can be addressed by the promotion of reuse in the community. For those with strong industrial history, the applicability of reuse allows for communities to preserve their industrial heritage, while at the same time shift uses to the new economy.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Urban Studies

Reference50 articles.

1. Arku, G. (2014). Competition and cooperation in economic development: Examining the perceptions of practitioners in Ontario, Canada. Journal of Urban Affairs, 36(1), 99–118.

2. Baer, C., & Brown, T. (2006). Location quotients: A tool for comparing regional industry compositions. Incontext Indiana. Retrieved from http://www.incontext.indiana.edu/2006/march/1.asp

3. Blair, J. P., & Premus, R. (1987). Major factors in industrial location: A review. Economic Development Quarterly, 1, 72–85.

4. Bobrow, D., Eulau, H., Landau, M., Jones, C., & Axelrod, R. (1977). The place of policy analysis in political science: Five perspectives. American Journal of Political Science, 21(2), 415–433.

5. Bourne, L., Britton, J. N. H. N., & Leslie, D. (2011). The greater Toronto region: The challenges of economic restructuring, social diversity and globalization. In L. S. Bourne, T. Hutton, R. G. Shearmur, & J. Simmons (Eds.), Canadian urban regions: Trajectories of growth and change (pp. 236–268). Oxford: Oxford University Press

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3