Abstract
Concerns regarding the impacts of climate change on marginalised communities in the Global South have led to calls for affected communities to be more active as agents in the process of planning for climate change. While the value of involving communities in risk management is increasingly accepted, the development of appropriate tools to support community engagement in flood risk management projects remains nascent. Using the Revitalising Informal Settlements and their Environments Program as a case study, the article interrogates the potential of citizen science to include disadvantaged urban communities in project-level flood risk reduction planning processes. This project collected more than 5,000 photos taken by 26 community members living in 13 informal settlements in Fiji and Indonesia between 2018 and 2020. The case study documents the method used as well as the results achieved within this two-year project. It discusses the method developed and implemented, outlines the main results, and provides lessons learned for others embarking on citizen science environmental monitoring projects. The case study indicates that the engagement model and the technology used were key to the success of the flood-monitoring project. The experiences with the practice of monitoring floods in collaboration with communities in Fiji and Indonesia provide insights into how similar projects could advance more participatory risk management practices. The article identifies how this kind of approach can collect valuable flood data while also promoting opportunities for local communities to be heard in the arena of risk reduction and climate change adaptation.
Reference79 articles.
1. Adomah Bempah, S., & Olav Øyhus, A. (2017). The role of social perception in disaster risk reduction: Beliefs, perception, and attitudes regarding flood disasters in communities along the Volta River, Ghana. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction, 23, 104–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijdrr.2017.04.009
2. Anguelovski, I., Shi, L., Chu, E., Gallagher, D., Goh, K., Lamb, Z., Reeve, K., & Teicher, H. (2016). Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation: Critical perspectives from the Global North and South. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 36(3), 333–348. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X16645166
3. Asian Development Bank, & RISE. (2021). Water-sensitive informal settlement upgrading: Description of technologies. Asian Development Bank and Monash University. https://www.rise-program.org/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/2603486/RISE_ADB-Knowledge-Products-3_FA4-hires.pdf
4. Assumpção, T. H., Popescu, I., Jonoski, A., & Solomatine, D. P. (2018). Citizen observations contributing to flood modelling: Opportunities and challenges. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22(2), 1473–1489. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-1473-2018
5. Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. SAGE.
Cited by
15 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献