Vulnerable Students, Inclusion, and Digital Education in the Covid‐19 Pandemic: A Qualitative Case Study From Austria

Author:

Möhlen Lisa-KatharinaORCID,Prummer Susanne

Abstract

Worldwide, more than 1.5 billion students had to switch to distance learning in 2020. Education took place at home, where parents attended to their children, and teachers taught their students in digital mode, while minors were physically and socially isolated from their peers. Concerning the situation in Austria, several quantitative studies expose two central challenges: First, the comprehensive lack of digital infrastructure disrupted (digital) distance learning. Second, the Covid‐19 pandemic particularly affected vulnerable students and extended educational inequality. The state of the art emphasizes a lack of qualitative studies demonstrating different perspectives on the educational situation of vulnerable students in general and with SEN in particular during the pandemic. This leads to the following research question: How do professional actors map the situation of inclusive and digital education during the Covid‐19 pandemic in Austria? To research this unprecedented situation, four focus groups with diverse stakeholders (teachers, principals, psychologists, and school board employees) discussed their experiences in the school years 2019–2020 and 2020–2021. Data were analyzed according to the Grounded Theory method of the postmodern approach referred to as “situational analysis.” The study visualizes various parallel discourses and voices within the situation of (digital distance) learning during the Covid‐19 pandemic. The theoretical context of the intersection of inclusive and digital education frames the empirical findings. Central findings relate to missing or discriminatory guidelines and policies, a lack of digital infrastructure, and altered professional‐pedagogical support that minimized or disrupted inclusive education during (digital) distance learning.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference33 articles.

1. Ahrbeck, B. (2014). Das Gleiche ist nicht immer gleich gut [The same is not always equally good]. Die Politische Meinung, 59(525), 13–18.

2. Besic, E., & Holzinger, A. (2020). Fernunterricht für Schüler*innen mit Behinderungen: Perspektiven von Lehrpersonen [Distance learning for students with disabilities: Teachers’ perspectives]. Zeitschrift für Inklusion, 3. https://www.inklusion-online.net/index.php/inklusion-online/article/view/580

3. Biewer, G. (2017). Grundlagen der Heilpädagogik und Inklusiven Pädagogik [Basics of special education and inclusive education]. Klinkhardt Verlag.

4. BMBWF. (2020). Beilage zum Erlass des BMBWF GS 2020–0.748.656, Schulbetrieb ab dem 17 [Supplement to the decree BMBWF GS 2020–0.748.656, School visits after 17th].

5. BMBWF. (2021). Beilage zum Erlass des BMBWF GZ 2021–0.065.827, Schulbetrieb ab dem 08 [Supplement to the decree BMBWF GZ 2021–0.065.827, School visits after 08th].

Cited by 3 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3