Re‐Imagining Inclusion Through the Lens of Disabled Childhoods

Author:

Balter Alice-Simone,Feltham Laura E.,Parekh Gillian,Douglas Patty,Underwood Kathryn,Van Rhijn Tricia

Abstract

The purpose of this article is to contribute new insights to critical disability and disabled children’s childhood studies that center on the valuing of disabled children’s lives—a guiding purpose in the disability justice movement. We use published findings from the Inclusive Early Childhood Service System project, a longitudinal, institutional ethnography of the ways that families and children are organized around categories of disability, which show social inclusions and exclusions before and during the pandemic. These findings illuminate: (a) institutional flexibility for the purpose of social inclusion and isolation during the pandemic as a result of institutional organization; (b) the impact of institutional decisions around closures, remote programs, and support on families’ choices and self‐determination; and (3) the ways safety is differently applied and rationalized for disabled children allowing institutions to exclude disabled children and families. We use critical disability studies and disabled children’s childhood studies to interpret these findings and position the valuing of disabled children’s lives with a call for disability justice actions.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference83 articles.

1. Abberley, P. (1987). The concept of oppression and the development of a social theory of disability. Disability, Handicap & Society, 2(1), 5–19.

2. Abrams, T., & Abbott, D. (2020). Disability, deadly discourse, and collectivity amid Coronavirus (COVID-19). Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 22(1), 168–174. https://doi.org/10.16993/sjdr.732

3. Bartlett, M., & Rice, N. E. (2019). The fallacy of choice: The story of Nelly. International Critical Childhood Policy Studies, 7(2), 44–59.

4. Bell, C. (2006). Introducing white disability studies: A modest proposal. In L. Davis (Ed.), The disability studies reader (2nd ed., pp. 275–282). Routledge.

5. Bowden, O. (2021, January 18). Educators raise safety concerns about special needs students being back in the classroom. But parents say their kids need the support. Toronto Star. https://www.thestar.com/news/gta/2021/01/18/educators-raise-safety-concerns-about-special-needs-students-being-back-in-the-classroom-but-parents-say-their-kids-need-the-support.html

Cited by 2 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3