Assessing Inclusivity Through Job Quality in Digital Plat‐Firms

Author:

Arcidiacono Davide,Piccitto Giorgio

Abstract

A great deal of the literature has underlined how job quality is a key element in individual well‐being. However, the rise in platform work challenges this issue, since not only do “plat‐firms” play an increasingly important role in job matching, work organization, and industrial relations, but they also increase the risks of a poorly inclusive socio‐technical system in terms of the quality of working conditions and accessibility. In this sense, the platform economy is intertwined with multiple forms of social exclusion by acting on pre‐existing inequalities that stratify workers within the labor market. This is particularly true in Italy, a country with a strongly dualistic labor market, which leads to a remarkable gap between insider and outsider workers. Therefore, the goal of our analysis is to evaluate the impact of the platform model on job quality in the Italian context. This will be accomplished by adopting an integrated and multidimensional perspective through the application of the OECD Job Quality Framework. The analysis identifies how job quality is differently affected by the type of platform work involved in terms of creating differentiated patterns of social inclusion/exclusion in the case of platform workers.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference60 articles.

1. Aleksynska, M., Bastrakova, A., & Kharchenko, N. (2019). Working conditions on digital labour platforms: Evidence from a leading labour supply economy (Discussion Paper 12245). IZA.

2. Aloisi, A. (2016). Commoditized workers. Case study research on labour law issues arising from a set of ‘on-demand/gig economy’ platforms. Comparative Labor Law&Policy, 37(1), 653–670.

3. Arcidiacono, D. (2019). Triangulating net-nography and digital methods to study the peer2peer economy. SAGE.

4. Arcidiacono, D., Pais, I., & Piccitto, G. (2021). La qualità del lavoro nella platform economy: Da diritto a servizio [Job quality in the platform economy: From right to service]. Politiche Sociali, 8(1), 75–98.

5. Arcidiacono, D., Pais, I., & Piccitto, G. (2023). Are platform changing professionalism? In L. Maestripieri & A. Bellini (Eds.), Professionalism and social change: Processes of differentiation within, between and beyond professions (pp. 103–123). Palgrave Macmillan.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3