Domestic Cleaners in the Informal Labour Market: New Working Realities Shaped by the Gig Economy?

Author:

Wiesböck LauraORCID,Radlherr Julia,Vo Mai Linh Angelique

Abstract

Previous studies show that gig economy‐based work opens up new ways in which inequalities are (re)produced. In this context, it is particularly important to look at female cleaners in private households, where gender inequalities intersect with other axes of disadvantage such as class, migratory experience, or ascribed ethnicity. This spatially and linguistically fragmented group presents challenges for scientific research, which is reflected in insufficient data available to date. The aim of the project GigClean—from which research for this article is drawn—is to address this gap. The guiding research question is: How do domestic cleaners in the informal labour market experience working in the gig economy? The methodological design consists of 15 problem‐centred interviews with platform‐based cleaning labourers in private households in Vienna, who predominantly operate in the informal economy. Our results suggest that undeclared domestic work via online plat‐forms is associated with increased power gaps between workers and clients as well as changing working conditions to the detriment of cleaners. Specifically, three recurring themes could be identified: reserve army mechanisms; lookism, objectification, and sexual harassment; and information asymmetry and control.

Publisher

Cogitatio

Subject

Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology

Reference85 articles.

1. Adkins, L., & Dever, M. (2016). The financialisation of social reproduction: Domestic labour and promissory value. In L. Adkins & M. Dever (Eds.), The post-Fordist sexual contract: Working and living in contingency (pp. 129–145). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1057/9781137495549_7

2. Anwar, M. A., & Graham, M. (2020). Hidden transcripts of the gig economy: Labour agency and the new art of resistance among African gig workers. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(7), 1269–1291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518x19894584

3. Barzilay, A. R. (2019). The technologies of discrimination: How platforms cultivate gender inequality. The Law & Ethics of Human Rights, 13(2), 179–202. https://doi.org/10.1515/lehr-2019-2006

4. Blanchard, O., & Hunt, A. (2022). Global perspectives on women, work, and digital labour platforms. A collection of articles from around the world on women’s experiences of digital labour platforms. Digital Future Society. https://digitalfuturesociety.com/app/uploads/2022/11/Global_Perspectives_on_Women_Work_and_Digital_Labour_Platforms.pdf

5. Bor, L. (2021). Helpling hilft nicht. Zur Auslagerung von Hausarbeit über digitale Plattformen [Helpling is not helping. The externalisation of domestic work via digital platforms]. In M. Altenried, J. Dück, & M. Wallis (Eds.), Plattformkapitalismus und die Krise der sozialen Reproduktion [Platform capitalism and the crisis of social reproduction] (pp. 148–167). Westfälisches Dampfboot.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3