Abstract
This thematic issue aims to deepen the theoretical as well as empirical knowledge on the inclusiveness of social rights, focussing on the revelatory case of parenting‐related leave policies. This editorial defines (leave) inclusiveness and discusses extant research on varying entitlements and eligibility criteria in the field of parenting leaves. It summarises the conceptual, methodological, and empirical contributions made by the articles in the thematic issue and closes with a research outlook.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology
Reference25 articles.
1. Anttonen, A., Haikio, L., Stefansson, K., & Sipila, J. (2012). Universalism and the challenge of diversity. In A. Anttonen, L. Haikio, & K. Stefansson (Eds.), Welfare state, universalism and diversity (pp. 1–15). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
2. Blank, F. (2011). Soziale Rechte 1998–2005: Die Wohlfahrtsstaatsreformen der rot‐grünen Bundesregierung [Social rights 1998–2005. The welfare state reforms of the red‐green government]. Wiesbaden: VS.
3. Budowski, M., & Künzler, D. (2020). Universalism in social policies: A multidimensional concept, policy idea or process. Social Inclusion, 8(1), 86–89.
4. Clasen, J., & Clegg, D. (2007). Levels and levers of conditionality: Measuring change within welfare states. In J. Clasen & N. A. Siegel (Eds.), Investigating welfare state change: The ‘dependent variable problem’ in comparative analysis (pp. 166–197). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
5. Dobrotić, I., & Blum, S. (2019). A social right: Access to leave and its relation to parents’ labour market position. In P. Moss, A.‐Z. Duvander, & A. Koslowski (Eds.), Parental leave and beyond: Recent international developments, current issues and future directions (pp. 261–282). Bristol: Policy Press.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献