Author:
Reims Nancy,Tophoven Silke
Abstract
Poor young people more often face health difficulties, (learning) disabilities, and are overrepresented in special schools. Consequently, youth from poor households disproportionately frequently participate in disability‐specific programs aiming to improve their educational levels and labor market opportunities. They face a double burden of disability and poverty. In our study, we look at poor and non‐poor youth with disabilities (YPWD) who participate in vocational rehabilitation (VR) and whether VR helps them (a) in transitioning into employment and (b) in leaving poverty. We examine the association between the receipt of initial basic income support (BIS) as a poverty indicator, later labor market outcomes, and earned vocational qualification using administrative data. We make use of a sample of all persons accepted for VR in 2010 (N = 36,645). We employ logit models on VR attendees’ labor market outcomes three and five years after being accepted for VR as well as on their earned vocational qualifications. Beside initial poverty status, we control for educational level, type, and degree of disability and program pattern during the VR process. Our findings show that YPWD from poor households have a decreased likelihood of a vocational certificate and employment. Additionally, they are more likely to receive BIS than young people not from poor households and thus more likely to remain poor. In conclusion, VR seems to support poor YPWD less in their school‐to‐work transitions. Thus, disability‐specific programs should be more tailored to the social situations of participants, and counsellors should be more sensitive to their social backgrounds.
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,Social Psychology
Reference40 articles.
1. Achatz, J., Jahn, K., & Schels, B. (2020). On the non-standard routes: Vocational training measures in the school-to-work transitions of lower-qualified youth in Germany. Journal of Vocational Education & Training. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13636820.2020.1760335
2. Almqvist, A.-L., & Lassinantti, K. (2018). Young people with complex needs meet complex organizations: An interview study with Swedish professionals about sustainable work practices. Community, Work & Family, 21(5), 620–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/13668803.2018.1527758
3. Bäcker, G., Naegele, G., & Bispinck, R. (2020). Sozialpolitik und soziale Lage [Social policy and social conditions]. In G. Bäcker, G. Naegele, & R. Bispinck (Eds.), Sozialpolitik und soziale Lage in Deutschland: Ein Handbuch [Social policy and social conditions in Germany: A handbook] (pp. 1–54). Wiesbaden: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-06249-1_1
4. Becker, R., & Lauterbach, W. (2016). Bildung als Privileg—Ursachen, Mechanismen, Prozesse und Wirkungen. [Education as a privilege: Causes, mechanisms, processes and effects]. In R. Becker & W. Lauterbach (Eds.), Bildung als Privileg: Erklärungen und Befunde zu den Ursachen der Bildungsungleichheit [Education as a privilege: Explanations and findings on the causes of educational inequality] (pp. 3–53). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-11952-2_1
5. Blanck, J. M., Edelstein, B., & Powell, J. J. W. (2013). Persistente schulische Segregation oder Wandel zur inklusiven Bildung? Die Bedeutung der UN-Behindertenrechtskonvention für Reformprozesse in den deutschen Bundesländern [Persistent school segregation or change towards inclusive education? The Significance of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities for Reform Processes in the German Federal States] Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Soziologie = Revue Suisse de Sociologie, 39(5), 267–292.
Cited by
3 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献