STRONG ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT WITHOUT JUDICIAL INDEPENDENCE IN CHINA: A REVIEW

Author:

Islam M. S.1,Xin X.2

Affiliation:

1. International Islamic University Chittagong

2. School of Law, Beijing Institute of Technology

Abstract

Over the last four decades, China has sustained extraordinary economic development despite Western assertions of under-constructed economic markets and the lack of an independent adjudicative process. The purpose of this paper is to set out the context of China’s judicial independence and high economic development scenario in the global economy. The paper aims to establish that vast economic expansion is possible without the conventional concept of an independent judiciary in which China provides an important example for the world. The study is mainly qualitative in nature and takes the analytical approach. The data and statistics have been collected from sources of the World Bank, IMF, WTO, UNCTAD, The World Factbook of the CIA, and the Chinese National Bureau of Statistics. The content analysis references the Chinese Constitution and judges law, reports of the Supreme People’s Court, books, journal articles, newspaper articles, media reports, and internet documents. The findings of the study are that China preserves “adjudicative independence” as a unique feature instead of embracing the Western concept of judicial independence that promotes the confidence of investors to make more investments. Additionally, the initiatives of “Made in China” and “One Belt, One Road” attach new wings to China’s emergence as the world’s crucial economic power. The article concludes that China’s experience provides a lesson for policymakers and economists of other developing or transitional countries struggling with weak legal and court systems, and emerging financial markets. The study strengthens the flourishing literature on the connection between judicial independence and economic development.

Publisher

Tyumen State University

Subject

Law

Reference42 articles.

1. Allen F. et al. Law, Finance, and Economic Growth in China, 77(1) Journal of Financial Economics 57 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2004.06.010

2. Buscaglia E. & Dakolias M. An Analysis of the Causes of Corruption in the Judiciary, 30 Law and Policy in International Business 95 (1999).

3. Chan P.C.H. An Uphill Battle: How China’s Obsession with Social Stability Is Blocking Judicial Reform, 100(3) Judicature 14 (2016).

4. Chavez R.B. The Rule of Law and Courts in Democratizing Regimes in The Oxford Handbook of Law and Politics 63 (K.E. Whittington et al. (eds.), New York: Oxford University Press, 2008). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199208425.003.0005

5. Chen G. The Principle of Judicial Independence with Chinese Characteristics from the Perspective of Comparative Law, 27(11) Chinese Prosecutor 1 (2013).

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3