Digital Financial Assets: Concept and Legal Nature

Author:

Efimova L.1,Sizemova О.2,Chub D.3

Affiliation:

1. Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)

2. Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod

3. Gazprombank

Abstract

Tokens and other digital technologies, in essence, can be considered neither property nor objects of civil law, nor are they inherently a part of civil rights per se. These technical solutions acquire a corresponding legal status only when they become an object of such legal relations. When this occurs, they are considered digital assets and are consequently subject to legal regulations. The legal nature of tokens is amatter of much dispute: some define them as objects of civil law, while others view them as a means to confirm the rights to a legal object. This article aims to prove that tokens can serve both functions. In most cases, tokens serve as a means of confirming rights to certain tangible objects (for instance, tokens as a means to secure civil rights). In this function, tokens for cryptocurrencies and digital securities, however, become legal objects in and of themselves because they play a part in legal relations (that is, tokens serve as a legal object). Tokens can be objects of absolute and relative rights. The common law doctrine treats an absolute right to cryptocurrencies and digital securities as a property right. Continental law, on the contrary, cannot include them in the property rights category since property within this legal framework is always tangible. Digital assets, however, are intangible. Therefore, they are not property. This article suggests that digital assets are objects of a new absolute right that is similar to property rights, except for one distinction: an object is not necessarily a thing. Based on the authors’ concept, this new right can be referred to as an absolute digital right.

Publisher

Tyumen State University

Reference32 articles.

1. Bali M. Les cryptomonnaies, une application des blockchain technologies àla monnaie [Cryptocurrencies: An Application of Blockchain Technologies to Money] (2016).

2. Barban P. & Magnier V. Blockchain et droit des sociétés [Blockchain and Corporate Law] (2019).

3. Barbaroux N. et al. Blockchain et finance– approche pluridisciplinaire (IP/IT) [Blockchain and Finance– AMultidisciplinary Approach (IP/IT)], 28 Répertoire IP/IT et Communication 125 (2020).

4. Callens E. Financial Instruments Entail Liabilities: Ether, Bitcoin, and Litecoin Do Not, 40 Computer Law & Security Review (Article 105494) (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105494

5. De Filippi P. & Hassan S. Blockchain Technology as a Regulatory Technology: From Code Is Law to Law Is Code, 21(12) First Monday (2016). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v21i12.7113

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3