Comparative analysis of filtering methods for measurement data from complex well configurations

Author:

Shengeliya David Yu.1,Kovalenko Igor V.2,Zakharova Irina G.1

Affiliation:

1. University of Tyumen

2. Gazpromneft Science & Technology Center

Abstract

This article presents a comparative analysis of various filtering methods for synthetic measurements that simulate data from well test analysis (WTA). The main objective of this work is to identify the most effective filtering methods for noisy WTA data, with the aim of preserving useful information and facilitating the subsequent interpretation of the results. The initial dataset consisted of 200 synthetic pressure drawdown (PDD) and pressure buildup (PBU) curves with varying levels of artificially introduced noise. Both classical filtering methods (Kalman filter, Savitzky–Golay filter, one-dimensional Gaussian filtering) and numerical methods based on neural networks (autoencoders) and machine learning (support vector machines) were considered for data filtering. The comparative analysis demonstrated that the performance of different filtering methods depends on the type of curve (PDD or PBU) and the well characteristics. The best results in terms of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and root mean square error (RMSE) were achieved using modern autoencoder-based methods. The conclusion is that the choice of an optimal filtering method requires a detailed analysis of the specific problem and the characteristics of the input data. A combination of different filtering methods is proposed to improve the quality of processing and interpretation of WTA data for complex well designs. The obtained results have practical significance, as they can simplify the segmentation of PDD and PBU curves, which is necessary for the correct identification of various operating periods of the well during the investigation process.

Publisher

Tyumen State University

Reference19 articles.

1. Asalkhuzina, G. F., Davletbaev, A. Ya., Khabibullin, I. L., & Akhmetova, R. R. (2020). On the selection of suitable operate durations for injection tests in low permeability reservoirs. Tyumen State University Herald. Physical and Mathematical Modeling. Oil, Gas, Energy, 6(1), 135–149. https://doi.org/10.21684/2411-7978-2020-6-1-135-149 [In Russian]

2. Brilliant, L. S., Dulkarnaev, M. R., Danko, M. Yu., Elisheva, A. O., Nabiev, D. Kh., Khutornaya, A. I., & Malkov, I. N. (2022). Oil production management based on neural network optimization of well operation at the pilot project site of the Vatyeganskoe field (Territorial Production Enterprise Povkhneftegaz). Georesources, 24(1), 3–15. https://doi.org/10.18599/grs.2022.1.1 [In Russian]

3. Bukhmastova, S. V., Fakhreeva, R. R., Pityuk, Yu. A., Davletbaev, A. Ya., Azarova, T. P., Farger, D. V., & Yakupov, R. F. (2020). Approbation of MLR and CRMIP methods in research of well interference. Oil Industry Journal, (8), 58–62. https://doi.org/10.24887/0028-2448-2020-8-58-62 [In Russian]

4. Esipov, D. V., Kuranakov, D. S., Lapin, V. N., & Cherny, S. G. (2014). Mathematical models of hydraulic fracturing. Computational Technologies, 19(2), 33–61. [In Russian]

5. Zaikin, A. A., & Kareev, I. A. (2020). Modeling fluid flows in oil fields using the Kalman filter. Itogi nauki i tekhniki. Seriya “Sovremennaya matematika i ee prilozheniya. Tematicheskie obzory”, 175, 27–35. https://doi.org/10.36535/0233-6723-2020-175-27-35 [In Russian]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3