Abstract
In the conditions of intensive development of the information society, the problem of achieving and maintaining a balance of off- and online communications is becoming more relevant. This is especially significant for students, who study most actively and use various information technologies.
The purpose of this study lies in exploring the role of “third places” in the communications of modern students. The authors have employed a systematic approach, the method of structural and functional analysis and a sociological survey during the study to explore the space and define the system of “third places” in a modern city. Theoretical approaches and concepts that reveal the role of “third places” in the communications of man and society are addressed. In their theoretical and empirical analysis, the authors have employed R. Oldenburg’s concept of “third places” as the main one. The authors’ definition of “third places” is explained.
The empirical research reveals “third places” with prioritization among students, and their relevance in urban environments. The frequency of visits has been determined and the needs of young people structured through the “third places” approach.
The authors have studied students’ readiness to communicate with each other and strangers, using the opportunity of new acquaintances. The results have revealed that 33% of students have their own circle of contacts in “third places” and usually spend time with friends and acquaintances, family or relatives, much less often in loneliness and classmates. In the process of informal offline communication in “third places”, students do not completely disconnect from online communication.
In general, the survey data indicate a certain success in the “third places” performing one of its main functions — providing opportunities for free informal communication, expanding the circle of acquaintances. In order to maintain and develop traditional communications in the student community, it is strategically important to develop a system of “third places” that satisfy the needs of young people.
Reference42 articles.
1. Atamanova I. V., Kozlova N. V., Bogomaz S. A., Zalevskiy V. G., Neyaskina Yu. Yu. 2018. “The specifics of personal and environmental interaction on the example of student youth in three Russian cities”. Tomsk State University Journal of Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science. no. 41, pp. 90-105. [In Russian]
2. Batishchev G. S. 1995. “The culture of deep communication”. Questions of Philosophy, no. 3, pp. 95-129. [In Russian]
3. Bibler V. S. 1993. “Results and plans. Synopsis of the philosophical logic of culture”. Voprosy filosofii, no. 5, pp. 75-93. [In Russian]
4. Buber M. 1993. Me and You. Moscow: Vysshaya shkola. 176 pp. [In Russian]
5. Glazkov K. P., Zvereva E. A. 2014. “The favorite area: on the question of attachment to the city”. Sociology of Power, no. 2, pp. 165-189. [In Russian]
Cited by
1 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. LEISURE OF STUDENT YOUTH: RESULTS OF MONITORING RESEARCH;Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research;2021