THE BOUNDARIES PROBLEM OF THE 1950 EUROPEAN CONVENTION DYNAMIC INTERPRETATION ON HUMAN RIGHTS ON THE EXAMPLE OF ENSURING THE SOCIAL RIGHTS OF CONVICTS

Author:

KLYUCHNIKOV Andrew Yu.1

Affiliation:

1. Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration

Abstract

The 1950 Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms is an instrument for the dynamic development of the human rights system in the member states of the European Council. Such an active formation of the latter is due to the activities of the European Court of Human Rights. However, the case-law of the court is not always accepted in national jurisdictions, especially when it comes to the most sensitive areas of life in modern societies. As the goal of the research, the author sets out the identification of the current approach of this international court to the problem of social rights of convicts, especially in the context of ensuring their social rights. The material for the research was the case-law of the ECHR on the social rights of citizens - with special attention to the rights of persons in places of isolation from society, the legal positions of domestic researchers on the problem posed. The author uses traditional research methods - general scientific and special, with an emphasis on historical, social and legal methods. The paper describes the stages of the international soft law sources formation on penitentiary rules and the impact on this of the ECHR practice in the context of the discrimination standarts prohibition regarding the right of ownership and violation of the forced (compulsory) labor prohibition. A common European standard “the right of a convicted person to retire” has not yet been developed, which has been confirmed in the practice of the ECHR. This decision is due to the need to maintain the effectiveness of the entire convention system, the policy of compromises with states. Through the dynamic interpretation of the ECHR, this right is recognized as an element of the convention rights protection, the convict should be granted an increasing amount of social rights.

Publisher

Tyumen State University

Reference26 articles.

1. Barsukova V. N. 2019. “Facts and Assessments from the Point of View of Protecting the Honor and Dignity of the Individual”. Saratov State Law Academy Herald, No. 6 (131), pp. 28-34. [In Russian]

2. Klyuchnikov A. Yu. 2020. “Revealing Activism in Law Enforcement Approaches of Judges of the European Court of Human Rights”. Tyumen State University Herald. Social, Economic, and Law Research. Vol. 6, no. 1 (21), pp. 129-139. [In Russian]

3. Neshataeva V. O. 2017. “The Role of International Courts in the Formation of the Law of Cultural Values”. Sud’ya. No. 11, pp. 44-50. [In Russian]

4. Orekhov O. S. 2009. “About ‘the Doctrine of the Discretion of States’ in Practice of International Bodies”. Moscow Journal of International Law. No. 2 (74), pp. 244-262. [In Russian]

5. Grand Chamber of ECHR Judgment of 15 November 2001 in case No. 25196/94 “Iwańczuk v. Poland”. 2002. In: Bulletin of the European court of human rights. Russian edition. No. 2. [In Russian]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3