Influence of Clinical and Psychosocial Factors on the Acceptance of no Human Organs in Transplants: Xenotransplants

Author:

Pavan Cinthia Laureano1ORCID,Godoy Moacir Fernandes de1ORCID,Miyazaki Eliane Tiemi1ORCID,Silva Rita de Cassia Martins Alves da1ORCID,Goes Caio Hussid de2ORCID,Castiglioni Lilian1ORCID,Silva Renato Ferreira da1ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Faculdade de Medicina de São José do Rio Preto

2. Faculdade de Ciências Médicas da Santa Casa de São Paulo

Abstract

Introduction: Xenotransplantation is defined as the transplantation of cells, organs and tissues between different species. It is studied as an alternative method to acquire an adequate supply of human organs, which imbalance in demand results in increased mortality on the transplantation waiting list. The aim of the present study was to deepen knowledge about the psychosocial aspects that influence the acceptance or refusal of xenotransplantation, seeking to add information that contributes to patients’ decisions. Methods:A cross-sectional observational study was carried out on reports of the perception of potential recipients of a liver transplant treated at the referral center of a university hospital. Two groups of patients were selected for the study: 50 patients undergoing liver transplantation (transplant group = TxG) and 50 candidates on the waiting list (waiting list group = WLP). All of them were given a questionnaire that addresses the psychosocial aspects that led them to form their opinions about xenotransplantation. To compare the groups, parametric and/or nonparametric tests were used, according to the nature of the data, as well as association tests. Results: Among the interviewees, 91 (91%), being 46% in TxG and 45% in WLP believe that xenotransplants would be beneficial for patients on the waiting list and there was no significant difference between the two groups studied (p = 0.8418); 63 (63%) stated that religion influenced their opinions; 74 (74%) stated that their personal experiences, especially in relation to the suffering generated by their underlying diseases, influenced the way they answered the questionnaire. Conclusions: The acceptance of xenotransplantation is high among the studied groups, and advanced disease and its complications contribute to the acceptance of this treatment modality, both in patients who have already been transplanted and in those who are on the waiting list. Religion had a positive influence in the acceptance of the xeno-organ. None of the measured social and demographic factors scored a p ≤ 0.05 when correlated as a factor for the decision of accepting a xeno-organ. The low number of patients who rejected this technique claimed that lack of information on the subject influenced in their decision. The results gathered indicate a high acceptance of xenografts among the studied groups, and that dissemination of information about xenografts can contribute to increased receptivity to this procedure, furthering its potential as a solution for human organ shortages.

Funder

Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo

Publisher

Associacao Brasileira de Transplantes de Orgaos

Reference22 articles.

1. 1. Brazilian Transplantation Registry: Official channel of the Brazilian Organ Transplantation Association [Internet]. Year XXIV, n. 4. São Paulo: Brazilian Organ Transplantation Society, 2018. [cited 22 Dec. 2021]. http://www.abto.org.br/abtov03_ingles/Upload/file/BrazilianTransplantationRegistry/Eng_RBT2018-leitura.pdf

2. 2. Brazilian Transplantation Registry: Official channel of the Brazilian Organ Transplantation Association [Internet]. Year XXIII, n. 4. São Paulo: Brazilian Organ Transplantation Society, 2017. [cited 22 Dec. 2021]. https://site.abto.org.br/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/rbt-ingles2017-read_compressed.pdf

3. 3. Jasanoff S. Bodies in transition: Ethics in xenotransplantation research. Hastings Cent Rep. 2018;48(Suppl 4):S67-9. https://doi.org/10.1002/hast.960

4. 4. Bourguignon T, El Khoury R, Candolfi P, Loardi C, Mirza A, Boulanger-Lothion J, et al. Very long-term outcomes of the Carpentier-Edwards perimount aortic valve in patients aged 60 or younger. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015;100(3):853-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.03.105

5. 5. Lu T, Yang B, Wang R, Qin C. Xenotransplantation: Current status in preclinical research. Front Immunol. 2020;10:3060. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2019.03060

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3