Affiliation:
1. Swedish School of Library and Information Science, University of Borås, Sweden
2. Department of Arts and Cultural Sciences, Lund University, Sweden
3. Division of Environmental Communication, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Sweden
Abstract
Academic journals, archives, and repositories are seeing an increasing number of questionable research papers clearly produced using generative AI. They are often created with widely available, general-purpose AI applications, most likely ChatGPT, and mimic scientific writing. Google Scholar easily locates and lists these questionable papers alongside reputable, quality-controlled research. Our analysis of a selection of questionable GPT-fabricated scientific papers found in Google Scholar shows that many are about applied, often controversial topics susceptible to disinformation: the environment, health, and computing. The resulting enhanced potential for malicious manipulation of society's evidence base, particularly in politically divisive domains, is a growing concern.
Funder
Stiftelsen för Miljöstrategisk Forskning
Marcus och Amalia Wallenbergs minnesfond
Publisher
Shorenstein Center for Media, Politics, and Public Policy
Reference34 articles.
1. Antkare, I. (2020). Ike Antkare, his publications, and those of his disciples. In M. Biagioli & A. Lippman (Eds.), Gaming the metrics (pp. 177–200). The MIT Press. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/11087.003.0018
2. Barbour, R. S. (2001). Checklists for improving rigour in qualitative research: A case of the tail wagging the dog? BMJ, 322(7294), 1115–1117. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.322.7294.1115
3. Bom, H.-S. H. (2023). Exploring the opportunities and challenges of ChatGPT in academic writing: A roundtable discussion. Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, 57(4), 165–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13139-023-00809-2
4. Cabanac, G., & Labbé, C. (2021). Prevalence of nonsensical algorithmically generated papers in the scientific literature. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 72(12), 1461–1476. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.24495
5. Cabanac, G., Labbé, C., & Magazinov, A. (2021). Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science. Evidence of critical issues affecting established journals. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2107.06751