Compare the Effectiveness of Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) versus Checklist in Demonstration of Antenatal Abdominal Examination among Final Year G.N.M. students.

Author:

Ms. Ritika Janet Singh 1

Affiliation:

1. Shri Venkateshwara University, Gajraula, Uttar Pradesh, India

Abstract

The OSCE is an approach to the assessment of clinical competence in which the components of competence are assessed in a planned or structured way with attention being paid to the objectivity of the evaluation” Harden, 1988 .The Objective Structured Clinical Exam (OSCE) is a performance- based exam. During the exam, trainees are observed and evaluated as theygo through a series of stations where they interview, examine and treat standardized patients presenting with some type of problem. An OSCE is: • Objectivity, because examiners use a checklist for evaluating the trainees. • Structured, because every trainee sees the same problem and performs same tasks in the same time frame. • Clinical based, because the tasks are representative of those faced in real clinical situations • An evaluation method II – Materials and Methods Comparative research design was used with group I & group II to assess the effectiveness of objective structured clinical evaluation (OSCE) versus checklist in demonstration of antenatal abdominal examination among final year G.N.M students. The study conducted on 30 samples in each group. Data was collected using Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation and checklist for assessing performance of G.N.M final year students on abdominal examination. III – Results The overall mean and S.D. of OSCE was 11.03 with a percentage mean of 91.39% and 16.59 whereas the overall mean and S.D. of Checklist was 55.73 with a percentage mean of 79.62% and 11.24. The calculated ‘t’ value was higher than the table value (t58 = , P< 0.01). Hence, the null hypothesis was rejected and research hypothesis was accepted and it was inferred that in the present study there was significant difference between the effectiveness of demonstration on antenatal abdominal examination during pregnancy assessed by Objective Structured Clinical Evaluation (OSCE) & checklist among G.N.M final year students. Comparing the mean percentage of OSCE and Checklist 91.39% and 79.62%, it is inferred that the mean percentage of OSCE i.e. 91.39% is higher than the mean percentage of Checklist i.e. 79.62%. Therefore, it can be concluded that the OSCE is more effective than the checklist for evaluating the demonstration of abdominal examination during pregnancy. IV – Conclusion This study concluded that in comparison to, OSCE was found to be a more effective assessment tool than traditional method checklist. Use of OSCE as formative tool will help in modifying teaching- learning strategies so that both, the teachers as well as the students can derive maximum benefit

Publisher

Naksh Solutions

Reference17 articles.

1. Ananthakrishnan N, Objective structured clinical practical examination (OSCE) OSPE). J Postgrad Med 1993;39(2):82-4.

2. Bartfay, Rombough W.J., Howse R., LeBlanc R. The OSCE approach in nursing education: objective structured clinical examinations can be effective vehicles for nursing education and practice by promoting the mastery of clinical skills and decision-making in controlled and safe learning environments. Can Nurse. 2004;100(3):18–25. [Google Scholar]

3. Dandannavar V.S., Alan S. A comparative study to evaluate practical skills in physiology among 1st phase medical under graduates at JNMC Belgaum: traditional practical examinations versus objective structure practical examinations (TPE V/S OSPE) Int J Educ Res Technol. 2014 March;5(1):126–134. [Google Scholar]

4. El Nemer A., Kandeel N. Using OSCE as an assessment tool for clinical skills: nursing students' feedback. Aust J Basic Appl Sci. 2009;3:2465–2472. [Google Scholar]

5. Frantz J.M., Rowe M., Hess D.A., Rhoda A.J., Sauls B.L., Wegner L. Student and staff perceptions and experiences of the introduction of objective structured practical examinations: a pilot study. AJHPE. 2013 November;5(2) [Google Scholar]

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3