Dynamic Systematic Benefit Risk Analysis of Antiviral Drug Combination of Lopinavir - Ritonavir for Covid-19 Patient
-
Published:2022-11-17
Issue:
Volume:
Page:465-473
-
ISSN:2581-9429
-
Container-title:International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJARSCT
Author:
Ms. Rutuja G. Doke 1, Ms. Rupali R. Padwal 1, Ms. Minaj B. Inamda r 1, Ms. Monika R. Dumbre 1, Ms. Kalyani A. Sagar 1
Affiliation:
1. Samarth College of Pharmacy, Belhe, Pune, Maharashtra, India
Abstract
High-risk patients with early symptomatic COVID-19 in an outpatient setting. Lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol have been previously used to treat acute respiratory syndrome- coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) replication in clinical practice; nevertheless, their effectiveness remains controversial. In this study, we evaluated the antiviral effects and safety of lopinavir/ritonavir and arbidol in patients with the 2019-nCoV disease (COVID-19). Fifty patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were divided into two groups: including lopinavir/ritonavir group (34 cases) and arbidol group (16 cases). Lopinavir/ritonavir group received 400 mg/100mg of Lopinavir/ritonavir, twice a day for a week, while the arbidol group was given 0.2 g arbidol, three times a day. Data from these patients were retrospectively analyzed. The cycle threshold values of open reading frame 1ab and nucleocapsid genes by RT-PCR assay were monitored during antiviral therapy. None of the patients developed severe pneumonia or ARDS. There was no difference in fever duration between the two groups (P=0.61). On day 14 after the admission, no viral load was detected in arbidol group, but the viral load was found in 15(44.1%) patients treated with lopinavir/ritonavir. Patients in the arbidol group had a shorter duration of positive RNA test compared to those in the lopinavir/ritonavir group (P<0.01). Moreover, no apparent side effects were found in both groups. In conclusion, our data indicate that arbidol monotherapy may be superior to lopinavir/ritonavir in treating COVID-19.
Publisher
Naksh Solutions
Reference40 articles.
1. Kaplan, S. S. and Hicks, C. B. (2005) Lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of human immunodeficiency virus infection. Expert Opin. Pharmacother. 6 (9), 1573– 1585, DOI: 10.1517/14656566.6.9.1573 [Crossref], [PubMed], [CAS], 2. Chu, C. M., Cheng, V. C. C., Hung, I. F. N., Wong, M. M. L., Chan, K. H., Chan, K. S., Kao, R. Y. T., Poon, L. L. M., Wong, C. L. P., Guan, Y., Peiris, J. S. M., and Yuen, K. Y. (2004) Role of lopinavir/ritonavir in the treatment of SARS: Initial virological and clinical findings. Thorax 59 (3), 252– 256, DOI: 10.1136/thorax.2003.012658 [Crossref], [PubMed], [CAS]. 3. Nukoolkarn, V., Lee, V. S., Malaisree, M., Aruksakulwong, O., and Hannongbua, S. (2008) Molecular dynamic simulations analysis of ritronavir and lopinavir as SARS-CoV 3CLpro inhibitors. J. Theor. Biol. 254 (4), 861– 867, DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.07.030 [Crossref], [PubMed].[CAS]. 4. Zeldin, R. K. and Petruschke, R. A. (2003) Pharmacological and therapeutic properties of ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor therapy in HIV-infected patients. J. Antimicrob. Chemother. 53 (1), 4– 9, DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkh029 [Crossref], [PubMed]. 5. [Expert consensus on chloroquine phosphate for the treatment of novel coronavirus pneumonia] Zhonghua Jie He Hu Xi Za Zhi, 43 (2020), p. E019
|
|