An In-Depth Review of Test Automation Frameworks: Types and Trade-offs

Author:

Rohit Khankhoje 1

Affiliation:

1. Independent Researcher

Abstract

As the domain of software development continues to progress in terms of intricacy and magnitude, the integration of automated testing has become a vital element in ensuring the excellence and dependability of software. The implementation of automated testing frameworks assumes a pivotal role in streamlining the testing procedure; nevertheless, the selection of the appropriate framework category presents challenges and necessitates making prudent compromises. This academic paper presents a comprehensive exploration of automated testing frameworks, exhaustively investigating their diverse categories, attributes, and the associated compromises that emerge from their adoption. The paper initiates with a comprehensive examination of the literature, encompassing a concise overview of the current research and industry patterns regarding test automation frameworks. Following this, it presents an intricate evaluation of various types of frameworks, such as keyword-driven, data-driven, and behavior-driven frameworks, clarifying their individual principles and functionalities. One of the main topics explored in this paper concerns the factors that influence the choice of a particular type of test automation framework. By presenting a framework for decision-making, we offer guidance to professionals and organizations in making informed decisions that align with their project requirements, team expertise, and testing goals. Furthermore, this paper critically evaluates the trade-offs and challenges associated with each type of framework, addressing concerns related to different aspects of the framework. To assist professionals and decision-makers, we conclude by providing best practices and recommendations for effectively implementing and managing test automation frameworks. Moreover, we investigate the perspective of test automation frameworks, accentuating emerging patterns and contemplating the consequences of developing technologies like artificial intelligence and machine learning. In summary, this paper presents a comprehensive guide to the different types and trade-offs of test automation frameworks, equipping software professionals with the knowledge and insights necessary to make well-informed decisions and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their testing processes.

Publisher

Naksh Solutions

Subject

General Medicine

Reference9 articles.

1. Amaricai, S., & Constantinescu, R. (n.d.). Designing a Software Test Automation Framework. 10.12948/ISSN14531305/18.1.2014.14

2. Cervantes, A. (n.d.). Exploring the use of a test automation framework. 10.1109/AERO.2009.4839695

3. Khankhoje, R.. (n.d.). WEB PAGE ELEMENT IDENTIFICATION USING SELENIUM AND CNN: A NOVEL APPROACH. Volume 1(Issue 1), 1–17. https://sdbindex.com/Documents/index/00000641/00001-87891

4. Nascimento, N., & Santos, A. R. (n.d.). Behavior-Driven Development: A case study on its impacts on agile development teams. 10.1145/3387940.3391480

5. Rwemalika, R., Kintis, M., & Papadakis, M. (n.d.). On the Evolution of Keyword-Driven Test Suites. 10.1109/ICST.2019.00040

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3