Affiliation:
1. Independent Researcher
Abstract
As the domain of software development continues to progress in terms of intricacy and magnitude, the integration of automated testing has become a vital element in ensuring the excellence and dependability of software. The implementation of automated testing frameworks assumes a pivotal role in streamlining the testing procedure; nevertheless, the selection of the appropriate framework category presents challenges and necessitates making prudent compromises. This academic paper presents a comprehensive exploration of automated testing frameworks, exhaustively investigating their diverse categories, attributes, and the associated compromises that emerge from their adoption.
The paper initiates with a comprehensive examination of the literature, encompassing a concise overview of the current research and industry patterns regarding test automation frameworks. Following this, it presents an intricate evaluation of various types of frameworks, such as keyword-driven, data-driven, and behavior-driven frameworks, clarifying their individual principles and functionalities.
One of the main topics explored in this paper concerns the factors that influence the choice of a particular type of test automation framework. By presenting a framework for decision-making, we offer guidance to professionals and organizations in making informed decisions that align with their project requirements, team expertise, and testing goals.
Furthermore, this paper critically evaluates the trade-offs and challenges associated with each type of framework, addressing concerns related to different aspects of the framework. To assist professionals and decision-makers, we conclude by providing best practices and recommendations for effectively implementing and managing test automation frameworks. Moreover, we investigate the perspective of test automation frameworks, accentuating emerging patterns and contemplating the consequences of developing technologies like artificial intelligence and machine learning.
In summary, this paper presents a comprehensive guide to the different types and trade-offs of test automation frameworks, equipping software professionals with the knowledge and insights necessary to make well-informed decisions and enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of their testing processes.
Reference9 articles.
1. Amaricai, S., & Constantinescu, R. (n.d.). Designing a Software Test Automation Framework. 10.12948/ISSN14531305/18.1.2014.14
2. Cervantes, A. (n.d.). Exploring the use of a test automation framework. 10.1109/AERO.2009.4839695
3. Khankhoje, R.. (n.d.). WEB PAGE ELEMENT IDENTIFICATION USING SELENIUM AND CNN: A NOVEL APPROACH. Volume 1(Issue 1), 1–17. https://sdbindex.com/Documents/index/00000641/00001-87891
4. Nascimento, N., & Santos, A. R. (n.d.). Behavior-Driven Development: A case study on its impacts on agile development teams. 10.1145/3387940.3391480
5. Rwemalika, R., Kintis, M., & Papadakis, M. (n.d.). On the Evolution of Keyword-Driven Test Suites. 10.1109/ICST.2019.00040