Affiliation:
1. Shriram Mahila Vindhyan Mahavidhyalaya, Paniv, Malshiras, Solapur, (MS), India
Abstract
This research article embarks on a journey to unveil the often-unexplored intersections between nonlinear dynamics and quantum mechanics. Despite limitations in space, our investigation delves into two intriguing nonlinear parallels, prompting profound inquiries for readers. Employing a "quasi-botanical mode," we catalogue instances of nonlinear behaviour, aiming to provoke thought rather than furnish definitive quantitative validation. This perspective challenges the prevailing belief that quantum mechanics is inherently distinct from nature's inclination toward nonlinearities. In this endeavour, we echo Mielnik's notion of concealed "scientific newspeak," hinting at the presence of veiled nonlinear insights.
Reference28 articles.
1. Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., & Rosen, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review, 47, 777.
2. Bohr, N. (1935). Can quantum-mechanical description of physical reality be considered complete?. Physical Review, 48, 696.
3. Schrödinger, E. (1936). The present situation in quantum mechanics. Naturwissenschaften, 23, 807, 823, 844.
4. De Broglie, L. (1964). The Current Interpretation of Wave Mechanics: A Critical Study. Elsevier.
5. Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. J. (1993). The Undivided Universe. Routledge.