Using Deep Learning for PCB Fault Detection
-
Published:2024-06-09
Issue:
Volume:
Page:62-70
-
ISSN:2581-9429
-
Container-title:International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:IJARSCT
Author:
Darshan Gowda K R 1, Deekshith T H 1, Deepak V Gowda 1, Dr Manjunatha R C 1
Affiliation:
1. Global Academy of Technology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India
Abstract
Electronic components are mainly connected to one another using printed circuit boards, or PCBs. This phase holds significant importance in the production of electronic goods. The finished product may become unusable due to a minor PCB flaw. As a result, throughout the PCB manufacturing process, rigorous and thorough flaw identification procedures are essential. To guarantee the dependability and performance of electronic products, quality control and assurance procedures are essential in the electronics manufacturing process, especially when producing printed circuit boards (PCBs). Conventional inspection techniques are not always effective in locating different kinds of PCB flaws. Defect identification is essential to guaranteeing the dependability and functionality of electronic products since printed circuit boards, or PCBs, are essential parts of electronic gadgets. Conventional approaches to PCB defect detection, like manual inspection or traditional image processing methods, are frequently laborious, imprecise, and prone to human error. This research suggests utilizing the YOLOv5 model, a cutting-edge deep learning-based object detection technique, to create an automated PCB flaw detection system in order to overcome these difficulties
Publisher
Naksh Solutions
Reference11 articles.
1. PCB Defect Detection Using Denoising Convolutional Autoencoders Khalilian, S., Hallaj, Y., Balouchestani, A., Karshenas, H., Mohammadi, A. in The 2020 International Conference on Machine Vision and Image Processing (MVIP), held February 18–20, 2020, in Qom, Iran. 2. CNN-based reference comparison technique for PCB defect classification (Wei, P.; Liu, C.; Liu, M.; Gao, Y.; Liu, H.). 2018 J. Eng. 16. 3. Automated Visual PCB Inspection Algorithm: A Survey by P.S. Malge and R.S. Nadaf. 2014; Int. J. Eng. Res. Technol., 3. Accessible over the internet at https://www.ijert.org/a-surveyautomated-visual-pcb-inspection-algorithm (retrieved on April 15, 2020). 4. Malge, P.S. and Nadaf, R.S. employed mathematical morphology and image processing techniques to detect, classify, and localize PCBdefects. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 2014. 5. Cubuk, E.D.; Le, Q.V.; Zoph, B.; Ghiasi, G.; Cui, Y.; Srinivas, A.; Qian, R.; Lin, T.Y. For instance segmentation, basic copy-paste is a powerful data augmentation strategy. In Nashville, Tennessee, USA, June 20–25, 2021, IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition Proceedings.
|
|