Fish Marketing System in Aurangabad District (Maharashtra)-Reference-Cited by-同舟云学术

Fish Marketing System in Aurangabad District (Maharashtra)

Published:2023-01-30 Issue: Volume: Page:204-206
ISSN:2581-9429
Container-title:International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology
language:en
Short-container-title:IJARSCT

Author:

Ajit Gedam ¹,Rajni S. Amrawkar ²,Vasant K. Dongare ²

Affiliation:

1. Jijamata College, Bhenda, Nevasa, Ahmadnagar, Maharashtra, India

2. Sundarrao More College of Arts, Commerce & Science, Poaldpur, Raigad, Maharashtra, India

Abstract

The present study was conducted in fish markets of Aurangabad district namely Chhavani Bazar and Mondhanaka Bazar during September 2022 to December 2022 in order to investigate the market development ,Equipment used by the sellers, species composition , demand of edible fishes, price structure and women participation. Chhavani Bazar is more developed as compared to Mondhanaka Bazar . Major carps dominated both the fish markets followed by exotic carps. Market facilities are more at Chhavani bazar were as the prices are more affordable at Mondhanaka Bazar than Chhavani Bazar.

Publisher

Naksh Solutions

Subject

General Medicine

Reference12 articles.

1. Alam J. et al.(2010). A Study on Fish Marketing System in Swarighat , Dhaka , Bangladesh. Nature and science, 8(12).

2. Gaidhane DM, Subhas M., Khinchi PJ and Misar SD(2020): A study of Bhiwapur fish market in Chandrapur, Maharashtra., Int. Res. Journal of Science & Engineering, February 2020, Special Issue A7 : 407-410.

3. HatteV.,et al (2015):market structure and constraint analysis of fish markets in Nanded district of Maharashtra.Ind. Jour. Agril. Mktg., (Conf. Spl.) 29(2),PP-127-133.

4. He L, Ding Z, Yin F, Wu M (2016): The impact of relative energy prices on industrial energy consumption in China: A consideration of inflation costs. SpringerPlus 5: 1001.

5. Kumar, B.G. et al. (2008): Domestic Fish Marketing in India – Changing Structure, Conduct, Performance and Policies. Agriculture economic research review, 21: 345 –354.