Abstract
Social networks are now an integrated part of life in most digitally connected societies. Bringing scientific papers of interest to a defined audience using the appropriate channel might substantially contribute to the impact of a scientific discovery. Various media and metrics have come to the fore in strategizing dissemination of scientific information. This opinion piece offers insights from the social-media experience of digital editors of peer-reviewed journals from non-Anglophone countries.
Publisher
South Kazakhstan Medical Academy
Reference26 articles.
1. Cabrera D, Roy D, Chisolm MS. Social Media Scholarship and Alternative Metrics for Academic Promotion and Tenure. J Am Coll Radiol 2018;15(1 Pt B):135–141.
2. Gasparyan AY, Nurmashev B, Yessirkepov M, Udovik EE, Baryshnikov AA, Kitas GD. The Journal Impact Factor: Moving Toward an Alternative and Combined Scientometric Approach. J Korean Med Sci 2017;32(2):173–179.
3. Gasparyan AY, Ayvazyan L, Blackmore H, Kitas GD. Writing a narrative biomedical review: considerations for authors, peer reviewers, and editors. Rheumatol Int 2011;31(11):1409–1417.
4. 130+ Social Media Statistics that Matter to Marketers in 2019. Available from: https://blog.hootsuite.com/social-media-statistics-for-social-media-managers/ [Accessed Oct 17, 2019].
5. Pineda C, Pérez-Neri I, Sandoval H. Challenges for social media editors in rheumatology journals: an outlook. Clin Rheumatol 2019;38(6):1785–1789.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献，注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献，订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献