Amalgam Illogical Controller Design Using Amended Moth System for Heat Reduction in Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor
Author:
Loganathan P.1, Selvam P.1
Affiliation:
1. Vinayaka Mission’s Kirupananda Variyar Engineering College NH-47, Sankari Main Road, Periya Seeragapadi, Salem – 636 308. Tamilnadu, India
Abstract
The electric vehicle is seen as a possible replacement for current-generation automobiles and to address the rising pollution. In electrical drives, Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor (IGBT) modules deliver power to the motor generate a lot of heat during switching. However, heat generation in IGBT hinders the performance of the electric vehicle. The foremost existing techniques analyze the heat however does not control the heat production in the IGBT module, and also high heat density leads to failing components. Thus to reduce the heat generated in the IGBT module, the work proposed an amalgam illogical controller that handles nonlinearity and provides a quick response. This controller is further tuned by Amended Moth System (AMS) to reduce heat consumption in the IGBT module with electrical parameters. Furthermore, the IGBT is complex to excessive voltage and excessive temperature therefore the current and voltage harmonics in the inverter are reduced by a seamless genuine adaptive filter that detects and suppresses the specified harmonics in the estimated back-EMF, consequently reducing the harmonic position error in the estimated rotor position. Even though there is a problem with a wide range of frequency in the electric motor. To reduce the switching frequency supremacy harm checker is incorporated which is forced to choose active and zero voltage vectors alternatively, to decrease the variation in the switching frequency. Thus the proposed outcomes efficiently tackle the issues in EV and greatly reduce heat consumption in the IGBT module.
Publisher
North Atlantic University Union (NAUN)
Subject
Applied Mathematics,Computational Theory and Mathematics,Modeling and Simulation
Reference23 articles.
1. M. Ahsan, S. T. Hon, C. Batunlu and A. Albarbar, “Reliability assessment of IGBT through modeling and experimental testing,” IEEE Access, Vol. 8, 2020, pp. 39561-39573. 2. E. A. Grunditz, T. Thiringer and N. Saadat, “Acceleration, Drive Cycle Efficiency, and Cost Tradeoffs for Scaled Electric Vehicle Drive System,” IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol. 56, No. 3, 2020, pp. 3020-3033. 3. X. Dinga, M. Dua, T. Zhoua, H. Guoa, C. Zhangb and F. Chen, “A comprehensive comparison between sic-mosfets and si igbts based electric vehicle traction systems under low speed and light load,” Energy Procedia, Vol. 88, 2016, pp. 991- 997. 4. B. Ji, X. Song, W. Cao, V. Pickert, Y. Hu, J. W. Mackersie and G. Pierce, “In situ diagnostics and prognostics of solder fatigue in IGBT modules for electric vehicle drives,” IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, Vol. 30, No. 3, 2014, pp. 1535-1543. 5. E. Deng, Z. Zhao, Q. Xin, J. Zhang and Y. Huang, “Analysis of the difference of the characteristic between high power IGBT modules and press pack IGBTs,” Microelectronics Reliability, Vol. 78, 2017, pp. 25-37.
|
|