Vehicular Communication using Balanced Centralized and Decentralized Cluster Heads
-
Published:2022-01-31
Issue:
Volume:16
Page:718-723
-
ISSN:1998-4464
-
Container-title:International Journal of Circuits, Systems and Signal Processing
-
language:en
-
Short-container-title:
Author:
Iskandarani Mahmoud Zaki1
Affiliation:
1. Faculty of Engineering, Al-Ahliyya Amman University Amman, 19238 Jordan
Abstract
A new approach to vehicular communication employing equal weights for distance and vehicular speed for centralized and decentralized communication is presented. The main objective of this work, which is to establish utilization expression and characteristics for an optimized balanced vehicular communication is achieved. The technique is based on analyzing effect of communication process (centralized, decentralized) on transmission efficiency and probability of failure. The analysis using utilization function, cluster head selection time, and end to end transmission time. The simulation and analysis concluded that the decentralization approach is more efficient compared to the centralized approach, so combination of both is proved to be effective. The work also uncovered the need for optimization of vehicular speed relative to transmission radius and use of zoning to effectively improve transmission efficiency. Mathematical models are presented that covers a critical relationship between probability of transmission failure, cluster head selection time and end to end delay. Also, an important mathematical expression that considers cluster head selection time and end to end delay and their effect on connection utilization is presented. The work proves that combined centralized and decentralized techniques using balanced weights approach is effective using dynamic weights selection algorithm that determines optimum weights for both used variables (distance, Vehicular speed).
Publisher
North Atlantic University Union (NAUN)
Subject
Electrical and Electronic Engineering,Signal Processing
Reference34 articles.
1. U. A. Mughal, J. Xiao, I. Ahmad, and K. H. Chang, “Cooperative resource management for C-V2I communications in a dense urban environment,” Veh. Commun., vol. 26, p. 100282, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.vehcom.2020.100282. 2. B. L. Nguyen, D. T. Ngo, N. H. Tran, M. N. Dao, and H. L. Vu, “Dynamic V2I/V2V Cooperative Scheme for Connectivity and Throughput Enhancement,” IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst., vol. 2020, no. 2, pp. 1–11, 2020, doi: 10.1109/tits.2020.3023708. 3. D. F. Xie, Y. Q. Wen, X. M. Zhao, X. G. Li, and Z. He, “Cooperative driving strategies of connected vehicles for stabilizing traffic flow,” Transp. B, vol. 8, no. 1, pp. 166–181, 2020, doi: 10.1080/21680566.2020.1728590. 4. Y. Chen, C. Lu, and W. Chu, “A Cooperative Driving Strategy Based on Velocity Prediction for Connected Vehicles with Robust Path-Following Control,” IEEE Internet Things J., vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 3822–3832, 2020, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2020.2969209. 5. J. C. Mertens, C. Knies, F. Diermeyer, S. Escherle, and S. Kraus, “The need for cooperative automated driving,” Electron., vol. 9, no. 5, 2020, doi: 10.3390/electronics9050754.
|
|