Investıgatıon of the Relatıonshıp of Two-Glass Test Wıth Prostate Bıopsy and the Presence and Grade of Asymptomatıc Prostate Inflammatıon In Men Wıth Serum Prostate-Specıfıc Antıgen Level Between 2.5-10 Ng/Ml

Abstract

Objective: Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a marker used to detect prostate cancer. When high PSA values are detected, a prostate biopsy is performed considering the possibility of prostate cancer. PSA elevation is not specific to prostate cancer, but may also be caused by conditions such as benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), urinary tract infection, and chronic prostatitis. Prostate cancer is not detected in approximately 66% of patients undergoing a biopsy, and patients are exposed to unnecessary biopsy and biopsy complications. Chronic prostatitis is detected in approximately 40% of these biopsies. The two-glass test is based on examining urine before and after rectal examination, which is used in diagnosing chronic prostatitis. In this study, we aimed to reveal the two-glass test’s effectiveness in predicting the incidence of prostatitis and inflammation in patients with a PSA value of 2.5-10 ng/ml and who underwent prostate needle biopsy. Methods: Fifty-two male patients, aged between 50 and 78 years, with PSA values between 2.5 and 10 ng/ml, who applied to our clinic were included in the study. EPS-two-glass test and prostate biopsy were applied to all patients. EPS; is a sample obtained by removing the fluid from the urethra after a prostate massage; VB-3; shows the urine produced by taking about 10 ml of urine voided after massage. EPS and VB3 detect prostate infection. Under the microscope, ≥10 leukocytes were considered significant for prostate inflammation. According to the pathology results, the patients were divided into 3 groups; prostate cancer, BPH, and chronic prostatitis. The chronic prostatitis group was classified according to the histopathological calcification described by Nickel. Results: In this study, the ratio of chronic prostatitis was found to be 38%. VB3 positivity was found to be statistically significant in the chronic prostatitis group compared to the other groups (p = 0.028). Although there was no statistically significant difference between the prevalence of inflammation and PSA elevation, PSA was found to be higher in the multifocal inflammation subgroup than in the focal inflammation patient group. Conclusion: The relationship between chronic prostatitis and PSA elevation remains a mystery. Although no statistical relationship was found between inflammation and PSA elevation in this study, the significant correlation between chronic prostatitis and VB3 positivity reinforces the possibility of this relationship. We believe that our results will form the basis for further studies to avoid unnecessary biopsies.