A comparison of six DNA extraction protocols for 16S, ITS and shotgun metagenomic sequencing of microbial communities

Author:

Shaffer Justin P1ORCID,Carpenter Carolina S23ORCID,Martino Cameron134,Salido Rodolfo A15,Minich Jeremiah J6ORCID,Bryant MacKenzie1ORCID,Sanders Karenina1ORCID,Schwartz Tara1,Humphrey Gregory1,Swafford Austin D37ORCID,Knight Rob1389ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Pediatrics, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

2. Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

3. Center for Microbiome Innovation, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

4. Bioinformatics & Systems Biology Program, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

5. Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

6. Marine Biology Research Division, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

7. InterOme, Inc. Carlsbad, CA 92008, USA

8. Micronoma Inc. San Diego, CA 92121, USA

9. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA 92093, USA

Abstract

Microbial communities contain a broad phylogenetic diversity of organisms; however, the majority of methods center on describing bacteria and archaea. Fungi are important symbionts in many ecosystems and are potentially important members of the human microbiome, beyond those that can cause disease. To expand our analysis of microbial communities to include data from the fungal internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region, five candidate DNA extraction kits were compared against our standardized protocol for describing bacteria and archaea using 16S rRNA gene amplicon- and shotgun metagenomics sequencing. The results are presented considering a diverse panel of host-associated and environmental sample types and comparing the cost, processing time, well-to-well contamination, DNA yield, limit of detection and microbial community composition among protocols. Across all criteria, the MagMAX Microbiome kit was found to perform best. The PowerSoil Pro kit performed comparably but with increased cost per sample and overall processing time. The Zymo MagBead, NucleoMag Food and Norgen Stool kits were included.

Funder

Emerald Foundation

Crohn’s and Colitis Foundation of America

National Institutes of Health

National Institute of Food and Agriculture

Semiconductor Research Corporation

National Science Foundation

Office of Naval Research

Publisher

Future Science Ltd

Subject

General Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology,Biotechnology

Cited by 30 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3