Optimizing Pension Fund Investment Portfolio Using Post-modern Portfolio Theory (PMPT) Study Case: An Indonesian Institution

Author:

Wisista Rifqi Tyaga,Noveria Ana

Abstract

Categorized as first-level funding by OJK, their asset is greater than its actuarial present value, the funding ratio is greater than 100%, and the Pension Fund of PT XYZ (Dapen XYZ) found that their net asset was not growing as they should. This study employs Post-Modern Portfolio Theory (PMPT) to address the current issue facing the company, with the goal of determining the optimal extant portfolio and optimal stock recommendations from the IDXQ30 Index. The company’s portfolio optimization complies with OJK regulations and its investment direction, with the proportion of direct investments and property assets remaining unchanged. The findings showed the historical existing portfolio of Dapen XYZ from 2018 to 2022 has an expected return of 5.27% with a downside risk of 5.00%. Through optimization and substituting the composition of the listed stock with the optimized one, the overall portfolio might yield a 6.80% return with a 3.59% downside risk; this result is still below its target. This optimization suggested emptying the deposits, corporate bonds, and mutual funds and focusing on listed stock instruments. This action will yield an 8.80% return on 1.70% downside risk. In conclusion, the current portfolio of Dapen XYZ is not optimal, and the decision of the fund manager to re-enter the stock market for its portfolio is perfect for the current situation since this instrument might yield higher profit and liquidity if they are willing to change their stock universe to the more profitable one.

Publisher

European Open Science Publishing

Subject

General Medicine

Reference15 articles.

1. Asian Development Bank-ADB. (2021). Aging and social protection: Challenges for Asia and the Pacific (Report). https://www.adb.org/publications/aging-and-social-protection-challenges-asia-and-pacific.

2. Bodie, Z., Kane, A., & Marcus, A. J. (2020). Investments (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

3. Choueifaty, Y., & Coignard, Y. (2008). Toward maximum diversification. Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(1), 40-51.

4. Elton, E. J., Brown, S. J., Gruber, M. J., & Goetzmann, W. N. (2014). Modern portfolio theory and investment analysis. John Wiley & Sons.

5. Fabozzi, F. J., Gupta, F., & Markowitz, H. M. (2002). The legacy of modern portfolio theory. The Journal of Investing, 11(3), 7-22.

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3