Effects of an elastomeric technology garment on different external and internal load variables
-
Published:2023-01-20
Issue:2
Volume:2
Page:165-176
-
ISSN:2794-0586
-
Container-title:Scientific Journal of Sport and Performance
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:sci. j. sport perform.
Author:
Gene-Morales JavierORCID, Saez-Berlanga AngelORCID, Babiloni-Lopez CarlosORCID, Jiménez-Martínez PabloORCID, Ferri-Carruana Ana MaríaORCID, Martin-Rivera FernandoORCID, Colado Juan CarlosORCID
Abstract
Resistance training is one key method for improving physical conditioning. With this purpose, Menatechpro System® has designed an avant-garde garment that includes elastomeric technology that may stimulate the neuromuscular system in a better way, but a deeper knowledge of its effects is needed. Objective: To explore the effects of a new garment with elastomeric technology on upper-limb performance, and neuromuscular, perceptual, and cardiovascular responses in two upper-extremities exercises. Methodology: Fit young men trained in resistance exercises performed a seated shoulder press (80% of one-repetition maximum) and push up (bodyweight) until muscle failure with the garment that incorporates the elastomeric technology versus a placebo garment without it. The number of repetitions, mean propulsive velocity, mean and peak muscle activation, rate of perceived effort and perceived velocity, and heart rate were analysed. Possible differences were obtained with a two-way mixed ANOVA of repeated measures with post-hoc analysis. Results: Compared with a placebo garment, the use of this new garment with elastomeric technology improved positively the physical performance and muscular activation during the exercises analysed (p ≤ .05). Conclusion: Menatechpro System®'s elastomeric technology integrated into the garment could provide an optimal neuromuscular stimulus for the development of the performance during the upper extremity training.
Publisher
Asociacion Espanola de Analisis del Rendimiento Deportivo
Reference43 articles.
1. Aboodarda, S. J., Hamid, M. S. A., Muhamed, A. M. C., Ibrahim, F., & Thompson, M. (2013). Resultant muscle torque and electromyographic activity during high intensity elastic resistance and free weight exercises. European Journal of Sport Science, 13(2), 155-163. https://doi.org/10.1080/17461391.2011.586438 2. Aboodarda, S. J., Page, P. A., & Behm, D. G. (2016). Muscle activation comparisons between elastic and isoinertial resistance: A meta-analysis. Clinical Biomechanics, 39, 52-61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2016.09.008 3. Alix-Fages, C., Del Vecchio, A., Baz-Valle, E., Santos-Concejero, J., & Balsalobre-Fernández, C. (2022). The role of the neural stimulus in regulating skeletal muscle hypertrophy. European Journal of Applied Physiology, 122(5), 1111-1128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-022-04906-6 4. Andersen, V., Fimland, M. S., Kolnes, M. K., Jensen, S., Laume, M., & Saeterbakken, A. H. (2016). Electromyographic comparison of squats using constant or variable resistance. Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(12), 3456-3463. https://doi.org/10.1519/JSC.0000000000001451 5. Andersen, V., Fimland, M. S., Mo, D.-A., Iversen, V. M., Larsen, T. M., Solheim, F., & Saeterbakken, A. H. (2019). Electromyographic comparison of the barbell deadlift using constant versus variable resistance in healthy, trained men. PloS One, 14(1), e0211021. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211021
|
|