effects of a single or multi-step drop-set training compared to traditional resistance training on muscle performance and body composition
-
Published:2023-06-20
Issue:3
Volume:2
Page:410-422
-
ISSN:2794-0586
-
Container-title:Scientific Journal of Sport and Performance
-
language:
-
Short-container-title:sci. j. sport perform.
Author:
Fasihiyan MoeinORCID, Forbes ScottORCID, Taheri MaryamORCID, Lopez Jose GomezORCID, Babaie Mohammad, Dejam BaktashORCID, Nourshahi MaryamORCID
Abstract
The purpose was to examine two drop-set (DS) protocols (single step vs. multi-step) compared to traditional resistance training (TRT) over 8 weeks on changes in muscular strength, endurance and body composition. Twenty-seven trained males were randomized to one of three groups: traditional resistance training (TRT: n = 9), the single step drop set group (DS-S: n = 10) and the multi-step drop set group (DS-M: n = 8). Before and after training, body composition (percent body fat and skeletal muscle mass), and muscular strength and endurance (bench and leg press) were determined. Results: There was a significant interaction for leg press 1-RM (p < .001) and absolute change for leg-press 1-RM was significantly greater for both drop set protocols compared to TRT (p < .001). There were significant interactions for both leg press and bench press endurance (p < .001), with post hoc analyses revealing that only DS-M was superior to TRT (p < .001). There was a significant main effect of time for % body fat (p = .020), SMM (p < .001), however there were no differences between groups. Conclusions: Overall, single-step and multi-step drop-set training to failure appear to be effective strategies to enhance lower body strength, while only the multi-step drop set training enhanced muscular endurance compared to TRT.
Publisher
Asociacion Espanola de Analisis del Rendimiento Deportivo
Reference32 articles.
1. Angleri, V., Ugrinowitsch, C., & Libardi, C. A. (2017). Crescent pyramid and drop-set systems do not promote greater strength gains, muscle hypertrophy, and changes on muscle architecture compared with traditional resistance training in well-trained men. European journal of applied physiology, 117, 359-369. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00421-016-3529-1 2. Antonio, J., Kenyon, M., Ellerbroek, A., Carson, C., Burgess, V., Tyler-Palmer, D., ... & Peacock, C. (2019). Comparison of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) versus a multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance (InBody 770) device for body composition assessment after a 4-week hypoenergetic diet. Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology, 4(2), 23. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfmk4020023 3. Boidin, A., Tam, R., Mitchell, L., Cox, G. R., & O'Connor, H. (2021). The effectiveness of nutrition education programmes on improving dietary intake in athletes: a systematic review. British Journal of Nutrition, 125(12), 1359-1373. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0007114520003694 4. Brown, L. E., & Weir, J. P. (2001). ASEP procedures recommendation I: accurate assessment of muscular strength and power. Journal of Exercise Physiology Online, 4(3). 5. Coleman, M., Harrison, K., Arias, R., Johnson, E., Grgic, J., Orazem, J., & Schoenfeld, B. (2022). Muscular Adaptations in Drop Set vs. Traditional Training: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Strength and Conditioning, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.47206/ijsc.v2i1.135
|
|