Author:
Riedmaier Arian Emami,DeMent Kevin,Huckle James,Bransford Phil,Stillhart Cordula,Lloyd Richard,Alluri Ravindra,Basu Sumit,Chen Yuan,Dhamankar Varsha,Dodd Stephanie,Kulkarni Priyanka,Olivares-Morales Andrés,Peng Chi-Chi,Pepin Xavier,Ren Xiaojun,Tran Thuy,Tistaert Christophe,Heimbach Tycho,Kesisoglou Filippos,Wagner Christian,Parrott Neil
Abstract
AbstractThe effect of food on pharmacokinetic properties of drugs is a commonly observed occurrence affecting about 40% of orally administered drugs. Within the pharmaceutical industry, significant resources are invested to predict and characterize a clinically relevant food effect. Here, the predictive performance of physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) food effect models was assessed via de novo mechanistic absorption models for 30 compounds using controlled, pre-defined in vitro, and modeling methodology. Compounds for which absorption was known to be limited by intestinal transporters were excluded in this analysis. A decision tree for model verification and optimization was followed, leading to high, moderate, or low food effect prediction confidence. High (within 0.8- to 1.25-fold) to moderate confidence (within 0.5- to 2-fold) was achieved for most of the compounds (15 and 8, respectively). While for 7 compounds, prediction confidence was found to be low (> 2-fold). There was no clear difference in prediction success for positive or negative food effects and no clear relationship to the BCS category of tested drug molecules. However, an association could be demonstrated when the food effect was mainly related to changes in the gastrointestinal luminal fluids or physiology, including fluid volume, motility, pH, micellar entrapment, and bile salts. Considering these findings, it is recommended that appropriately verified mechanistic PBPK modeling can be leveraged with high to moderate confidence as a key approach to predicting potential food effect, especially related to mechanisms highlighted here.
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Reference58 articles.
1. Fleisher D, Li C, Zhou Y, Pao LH, Karim A. Drug, meal and formulation interactions influencing drug absorption after oral administration. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1999;36(3):233–54.
2. O'Shea JP, Holm R, O'Driscoll CM, Griffin BT. Food for thought: formulating away the food effect – a PEARRL review. J Pharm Pharmacol. 2019;71(4):510–35.
3. FDA. Assessing the Effects of Food on Drugs in INDs and NDAs — Clinical Pharmacology Considerations Guidance for Industry. 2019; Available from: https://www.fda.gov/media/121313/download.
4. EMA. Guideline on the Investigation of Drug Interactions. 2012.
5. Koziolek M, Alcaro S, Augustijns P, Basit AW, Grimm M, Hens B, et al. The mechanisms of pharmacokinetic food-drug interactions - a perspective from the UNGAP group. Eur J Pharm Sci. 2019;134:31–59.
Cited by
67 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献