Abstract
After centuries of serving as the metaphor for mutability, clouds began to be classified by genera and species in the nineteenth century, on the model of Linnaean taxonomy. In order to standardize nomenclature, cloud watchers had to learn to see in unison, recognizing cloud types as one would recognize human faces. The analogy between cloud and facial recognition runs deep: in both cases, a few salient features (that aquiline nose, those long wispy streaks) are foregrounded at the expense of a great many others. What the art of caricature is to faces, condensed description was to clouds: a few bold strokes that focused attention on the essential and screened out everything else. Cloud classification depended crucially on description by omission.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Sociology and Political Science,General Arts and Humanities,Cultural Studies,Gender Studies
Cited by
23 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. Breathless;S Asia Motion;2024-03-19
2. Empiricism Reformed;Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science;2024
3. Description: Its meaning, epistemology, and use with emphasis on information science;Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology;2023-09-22
4. Glacial Sensing: Entanglements of Sound and Vision;Visual Anthropology Review;2023-09
5. The Biography of a Face: Virginia Woolf's Orlando;Journal of Modern Literature;2023-06