Brain Responses to Real and Imagined Interpretation of Tonal Versus Atonal Music

Abstract

Professional musicians have been teaching/learning/interpreting Western classical tonal music for longer than atonal music. This may be reflected in their brain plasticity and playing efficiency. To test this idea, EEG connectivity networks (EEG-CNs) of expert cellists at rest and during real and imagined musical interpretation of tonal and atonal excerpts were analyzed. Graphs and connectomes were constructed as models of EEG-CNs, using functional connectivity measurements of EEG phase synchronization in different frequency bands. Tonal and atonal interpretation resulted in a global desynchronization/dysconnectivity versus resting—irrespective of frequency bands—particularly during imagined-interpretation. During the latter, the normalized local information-transfer efficiency (NLE) of graph-EEG-CN’s small-world structure at rest increased significantly during both tonal and atonal interpretation, and more significantly during atonal-interpretation. Regional results from the graphs/connectomes supported previous findings, but only certain EEG frequency bands. During imagined-interpretation, the number of disconnected regions and subnetworks, as well as regions with higher NLE, were greater in atonal-interpretation than in tonal-interpretation for delta/theta/gamma-EEG-CNs. The opposite was true during real-interpretation, specifically limited to alpha-EEG-CN. Our EEG-CN experimental paradigm revealed perceptual differences in musicians’ brains during tonal and atonal interpretations, particularly during imagined-interpretation, potentially due to differences in cognitive roots and brain plasticity for tonal and atonal music, which may affect the musicians’ interpretation.