Excess Success in “Ray of hope: Hopelessness Increases Preferences for Brighter Lighting”

Author:

Francis Gregory1,Thunell Evelina1234ORCID

Affiliation:

1. Department of Psychological Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, US

2. Centre de Recherche Cerveau et Cognition (CerCo), Université Paul Sabatier, FR

3. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université Paul Sabatier, FR

4. Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, SE

Abstract

Dong, Huang, and Zhong (2015) report five successful experiments linking brightness perception with the feeling of hopelessness. They argue that a gloomy future is psychologically represented as darkness, not just metaphorically but as an actual perceptual bias. Based on multiple results, they conclude that people who feel hopeless perceive their environment as darker and therefore prefer brighter lighting than controls. Reversely, dim lighting caused participants to feel more hopeless. However, the experiments succeed at a rate much higher than predicted by the magnitude of the reported effects. Based on the reported statistics, the estimated probability of all five experiments being fully successful, if replicated with the same sample sizes, is less than 0.016. This low rate suggests that the original findings are (perhaps unintentionally) the result of questionable research practices or publication bias. Readers should therefore be skeptical about the original results and conclusions. Finally, we discuss how to design future studies to investigate the relationship between hopelessness and brightness.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

General Psychology

Reference30 articles.

1. Registered replication report: Schooler and Engstler-Schooler (1990);Perspectives on Psychological Science,2014

2. Package ‘pwr’: Basic functions for power analysis,2018

3. Ray of hope: Hopelessness increases preferences for brighter lighting;Social Psychological and Personality Science,2015

4. The red-attractiveness effect, applying the Ioannidis and Trikalinos (2007b) test, and the broader scientific context: A reply to Francis (2013);Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2013

5. Red, Rank, and Romance in women viewing men;Journal of Experimental Psychology: General,2010

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3