Affiliation:
1. Eindhoven University of Technology, NL
Abstract
Although context effects have repeatedly been demonstrated, it remains difficult to predict how context features influence the associative meaning of concepts. In a recent series of Experiments (see Part 1, Schietecat, Lakens, IJsselsteijn, & de Kort, 2018), we proposed and tested the dimension-specificity hypothesis for understanding and predicting context-dependent cross-modal associations between saturation, brightness, and aggression. In the current manuscript, Part 2, we aim to further test the dimension-specificity hypothesis by predicting the context-dependency of the meaning of the color red observed in the literature. The results of a series of five experiments revealed that the associations between red and valence could be predicted based on the activated dimensions of meaning (i.e., the evaluation or activity dimension) through the opposing concepts in the task. In the context of green, red was associated with negativity, whereas in context of blue, red was mostly associated with activity. Therefore, red was related to both aggression (a negative concept) and enthusiasm (a positive concept), depending on the context.
Publisher
University of California Press
Reference39 articles.
1. The hue of shapes;Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance,2013
2. Situating Abstract Concepts
3. What’s so hot about red?;Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society,1972
4. The malleability of automatic stereotypes and prejudice;Personality and Social Psychology Review,2002
5. Color and psychological functioning: A review of theoretical and empirical work;Frontiers in Psychology,2015
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献