Affiliation:
1. Department of Classics, Waggener Hall, University of Texas, Austin, TX 78712, USA.
Abstract
Abstract: The purpose of the Roman indicia publica (as described by legal, rhetorical, and philosophical texts and even the name of the institution) was to determine whether or not defendants had violated the various “criminal” statutes which established them. Cicero's reports of the outcome of real cases suggest a popular expectation that jurors ordinarily attempted to carry out this task. The proliferation of distinct formal charges over time and the existence of jokes about orators fooling jurors confirm this suggestion. We are thus discouraged from imagining collusion between parties and jurors in which the formal charge is understood by all to be a pretext for a competition of oratorical skill or social standing. Roman jurors wanted to believe in their verdicts. Advocates, of course, did not simply tell the truth. Rather, they responded to popular expectations by going out of their way to emphasize the (purported) truth of their speeches.
Publisher
University of California Press
Subject
Linguistics and Language,Language and Linguistics
Cited by
20 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献
1. INTERSECTIONALITY IN CICERONIAN INVECTIVE;The Classical Quarterly;2022-12
2. Cicero's Political Personae;2020-08-31
3. Index;Cicero's Political Personae;2020-08-31
4. Index locorum;Cicero's Political Personae;2020-08-31
5. Works Cited;Cicero's Political Personae;2020-08-31