Abstract
As we consider music's role in defining races, cultures, and species, musicologists may benefit from examining more closely the history of conceptions of musical style. That history offers an opportunity to reassess the question of how and how much one of the core tools of music scholarship—the recognition and categorization of musical style—reflects a historical tradition of categorizing culture as a form of essential, biologized difference. This exercise seems particularly relevant in the present moment, when scholarly style categories converge with a renewed interest in evolutionary science. Tracing notions of style from the days of Guido Adler to the present, I argue that classifications of musical style have offered a way for music scholars to explore changing concepts of human difference. By asking what it means to identify a musical style, it is possible to engage more sensitively with music's power to classify human cultures, define human beings, and demarcate the perimeter of the humanities.
Publisher
University of California Press
Reference271 articles.
1. Adler, Guido. “Guido Adler's ‘The Scope, Method, and Aim of Musicology,’ (1885): An English Translation with an Historico-Analytical Commentary.” Translation and commentary by Erica Mugglestone.Yearbook for Traditional Music13 (1981): 1–21. Originally published as ”Umfang, Methode und Ziel der Musikwissenschaft.” Vierteljahrsschrift für Musikwissenschaft 1 (1885): 5–20.
2. Adler, Guido. “Haydn and the Viennese Classical School.” Translated by W. Oliver Strunk.Musical Quarterly18 (1932): 191–207.
3. Adler, Guido. “Internationalism in Music.” Translated by Theodore Baker.Musical Quarterly11 (1925): 281–300.
4. Adler, Guido. “Schubert and the Viennese Classic School.” Translated by Theodore Baker.Musical Quarterly14 (1928): 473–85.
5. Adler, Guido. Der Stil in der Musik. Vol. 1. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel, 1911.
Cited by
9 articles.
订阅此论文施引文献
订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献