Probe Tone Paradigm Reveals Less Differentiated Tonal Hierarchy in Rock Music

Author:

Vuvan Dominique T.1,Hughes Bryn2

Affiliation:

1. Skidmore College

2. University of Lethbridge, Lethbridge, Canada

Abstract

Krumhansl and Kessler’s (1982) pioneering experiments on tonal hierarchies in Western music have long been considered the gold standard for researchers interested in the mental representation of musical pitch structure. The current experiment used the probe tone technique to investigate the tonal hierarchy in classical and rock music. As predicted, the observed profiles for these two styles were structurally similar, reflecting a shared underlying Western tonal structure. Most interestingly, however, the rock profile was significantly less differentiated than the classical profile, reflecting theoretical work that describes pitch organization in rock music as more permissive and less hierarchical than in classical music. This line of research contradicts the idea that music from the common-practice era is representative of all Western musics, and challenges music cognition researchers to explore style-appropriate stimuli and models of pitch structure for their experiments.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Music

Reference26 articles.

1. On aeolian harmony in contemporary popular music;Critical essays in popular musicology,2007

2. Burgoyne, J. A., Wild, J., & Fujinaga, I. (2011). An expert ground truth set for audio chord recognition and music analysis. Proceedings of the 12th Conference of the International Society for Music Information Retrieval.

3. Craton, L. G., Juergens, D. S., Michalak, H. R., & Poirier, C. R. (2016). Roll over Beethoven? An initial investigation of listeners’ perception of chords used in rock music. Music Perception, 33(3), 332–343. https://doi.org/10.1525/mp.2016.33.3.332

4. Craton, L. G., Lee, J. H. J., & Krahe, P. M. (2019). It’s only rock ‘n roll (but I like it): Chord perception and rock’s liberal harmonic palette. Musicae Scientiae, 1029864919845023. https://doi.org/10.1177/1029864919845023

Cited by 5 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3