1. For participants listening to Anthèmes 1, each of these five blocks was itself performed three times, using the same stimuli, so that participants completed the same tasks with the stimuli belonging to one motivic family three times in direct succession. This was done in order to investigate the effects of repeated exposure to the complete piece on the recognition of the motives from each family. Statistical tests (ANOVA and logistic regression) suggested that listening to Anthèmes several times did not affect the listeners’ recognition of the motivic variations. We believe that this apparent lack of effect of repeated exposure on motivic recognition was largely due to a global effect of repeated exposure across the entire experiment, during which participants heard the piece a total of 15 times one after the other. Because the present paper does not deal with the effects of repeated exposure to the same piece of music, only the data corresponding to the first listening associated with each motivic family are reported and discussed here. For details concerning repeated exposure to Anthèmes1, see Taher, 2016.
2. This shows the conversion of the value of b reported below to the odds ratio (.78 in this case), which in turn allows us to report the percentage of decrease in motivic recognition per formal unit (22% in this case). Here, the value of .78 means that the odds decrease by approximately 22%. The odds ratio is obtained by raising e to the power of the b.
3. Bartlett, J.C., & Dowling, W. J. (1988). Scale structure and similarity of melodies. Music Perception, 5, 285–314.
4. Boulez, P. (1992). Anthèmes 1. Vienna, Austria: Universal Edition.
5. Boulez, P. (1997). Anthèmes 2: Pour violon et dispositif électronique. Vienna, Austria: Universal Edition.