Deliberative Democracy: Investigating the Longitudinal Impacts of Democratic Activities in Introductory Biology Courses

Author:

Rain-Griffith Liz1,Sheghewi Sarah2,Shusterman Gwendolyn P.3,Barbera Jack4,Shortlidge Erin E.5

Affiliation:

1. LIZ RAIN-GRIFFITH is a graduate student, at Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201; e-mail: evg@pdx.edu.

2. SARAH SHEGHEWI is an undergraduate researcher in the Department of Biology, at Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201; e-mail: sheghewi@pdx.edu.

3. GWENDOLYN P. SHUSTERMAN is a Professor of Chemistry and Co-Director of the STEM Education and Equity Institute, at Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201; e-mail: shusteg@pdx.edu.

4. JACK BARBERA is an Associate Professor of Chemistry, at Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201; e-mail: jbarbera@pdx.edu.

5. ERIN E. SHORTLIDGE is an Assisant Professor of Biology, at Portland State University, Portland, OR 97201; e-mail: eshortlidge@pdx.edu.

Abstract

There have been multiple national calls for curricular reform in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM), including a need to instill democratic skills in students. Democratic skill building can be embedded in STEM classrooms through intentional “deliberative pedagogies” that include communication, collaboration, and application of information. We developed and implemented a deliberative pedagogy, Deliberative Democracy (DD), for introductory majors and nonmajors undergraduate biology courses and took a longitudinal, qualitative research approach to understand students' experiences and perceptions of DD. We asked students to respond to open-ended survey questions regarding DD at two time points and conducted semi-structured follow-up interviews. All data were iteratively open-coded using content analysis. Students' perceptions of DD were lasting and generally positive, including self-reported themes related to DD promoting their awareness of the “real-world applications of science,” and increased “scientific literacy.” Negative perceptions of DD were largely related to issues with “group dynamics.” We detected differences between majors' and nonmajors' perceptions of DD, including in regard to scientific literacy and class time use. DD is a replicable pedagogy that can assist in instilling democratic skills in biology students.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

General Agricultural and Biological Sciences,Agricultural and Biological Sciences (miscellaneous),Education

Reference22 articles.

1. Validity of college self-reported gains at diverse institutions;Educational Researcher,2011

2. When group work doesn't work: insights from students;CBE–Life Sciences Education,2018

3. Cohen, D. & Crabtree, B. (2006). Semi-structured interviews. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, Qualitative Research Guidelines Project. http://www.qualres.org/HomeSemi-3629.html (accessed January31, 2019).

4. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales;Educational and Psychological Measurement,1960

Cited by 1 articles. 订阅此论文施引文献 订阅此论文施引文献,注册后可以免费订阅5篇论文的施引文献,订阅后可以查看论文全部施引文献

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3