The Master of Mystery

Author:

O’Grady Pat1

Affiliation:

1. Macquarie University; Email: pogmusic@gmail.com

Abstract

Over the past twenty years, the field of popular music studies has significantly enhanced our understanding of pop music production. Studies have drawn from a range of industry discussions to explore, for example, the ways in which emergent technologies have led to distinctive production techniques and the important role that recording technologies play in shaping the sound of pop music. Whereas many industry discussions have provided productive sites of analysis, they can also obstruct research in some respects. This article focuses on an area of music production where such industrial discussions tend to hinder, rather than enhance, an understanding of its practices. It examines the ways in which industry discussions position the process of mastering as “mysterious.” This article argues representations of mastering as “mysterious” work to reinforce the importance of this practice and also safeguard it from new technologies that might challenge its dominance. These representations can function to reproduce and secure social hierarchies within the field.

Publisher

University of California Press

Subject

Music

Reference112 articles.

1. Lee B Brown, “Phonography, Rock Records, and the Ontology of Recorded Music.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 58, no. 4 (2000), 361–72.

2. Theodore Gracyk, Rhythm and Noise: An Aesthetics of Rock (London: Duke University Press, 1996). 7

3. Simon Frith, Performing Rites: On the Value of Popular Music (Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1996): 230

4. Andy Bennett and Sarah Baker, “Classic Albums: The Re-Presentation Of The Rock Album on British Television.” in Popular Music And Television In Britain, ed. Ian Inglis (London: Ashgate, 2010).

5. Alan Williams, “‘Pay Some Attention to the Man Behind the Curtain’—Unsung Heroes and the Canonization of Process in the Classic Albums Documentary Series,” Journal of Popular Music Studies 22, no. 2 (2010): 166–79.

同舟云学术

1.学者识别学者识别

2.学术分析学术分析

3.人才评估人才评估

"同舟云学术"是以全球学者为主线,采集、加工和组织学术论文而形成的新型学术文献查询和分析系统,可以对全球学者进行文献检索和人才价值评估。用户可以通过关注某些学科领域的顶尖人物而持续追踪该领域的学科进展和研究前沿。经过近期的数据扩容,当前同舟云学术共收录了国内外主流学术期刊6万余种,收集的期刊论文及会议论文总量共计约1.5亿篇,并以每天添加12000余篇中外论文的速度递增。我们也可以为用户提供个性化、定制化的学者数据。欢迎来电咨询!咨询电话:010-8811{复制后删除}0370

www.globalauthorid.com

TOP

Copyright © 2019-2024 北京同舟云网络信息技术有限公司
京公网安备11010802033243号  京ICP备18003416号-3