Affiliation:
1. Michigan State University Julian Samora Research Institute Email: davilari@msu.edu
Abstract
This article considers questions of authenticity in two versions of Doug Sahm's “Chicano”: Sahm's original, recorded with the Sir Douglas Band in 1973, and Rumel Fuentes's 1976 cover version. Some critics and listeners considered Sahm's original, written from a first-person Chicano perspective, a gaffe, since Sahm was in fact not Chicano; however, employing Allan Moore's notion of authenticity as authentication, I argue that Fuentes's cover version is at once an endorsement of Sahm's original and an authentication of it. To do so, I begin by elaborating Moore's three-part typology of authenticity, and how this typology recasts authenticity as authentication. I then place Sahm's appropriation of a Chicano identity within a longer history of racial crossing in American popular music before providing historical context for each artist, and for each version of the song. Finally, by discussing the two versions in terms of Moore's typology, I argue that the cover authenticates the original through what Moore calls second-person authenticity, which he describes as a validation of the listener's experience.
Publisher
University of California Press
Reference148 articles.
1. “Good Old Rock and Roll: Performing the 1950s in the 1970s.”;Journal of Popular Music Studies,2003
2. “Latinos in the Garage: A Genealogical Examination of the Latino/a Presence and Influence in Garage Rock (and Rock and Pop Music).”;Popular Music and Society,2008
3. Bertrand, Michael. Race, Rock, and Elvis. Champaign, IL: University of Illinois Press, 2005.
4. Brandner, Liesl. “How a Black Man from Missouri Transformed Himself into the Indian Liberace.”New Republic (12September2015), https://newrepublic.com/article/122797/how-black-man-missouri-transformed-indian-liberace
5. “Canonical and Non-Canonical Texts.”;The Americas Review,1986